admin_270 371 Posted April 22, 2006 Report Share Posted April 22, 2006 A new scenario is now up: "U.N." - 2003, by Alex You can go to the President Forever Updates/Scenarios page to download this scenario. Please note: this is a third-party scenario - 80soft did not make this scenario. The 80soft.com Team Link to post Share on other sites
Flasuss 0 Posted April 22, 2006 Report Share Posted April 22, 2006 Did not worked for me (a message appeared about floating points). Link to post Share on other sites
Mrdie 2 Posted April 23, 2006 Report Share Posted April 23, 2006 Played it, and I'm dissapointed. The list of issues is...bad, and..well..pretty much the entire scenario did not interests me. Sorry. But you can always do better. Link to post Share on other sites
alex xauw 1 Posted April 23, 2006 Report Share Posted April 23, 2006 Did not worked for me (a message appeared about floating points). What options did you use and who did you try to play as? I'll see if I can recreate the problem... Played it, and I'm dissapointed. The list of issues is...bad, and..well..pretty much the entire scenario did not interests me.Sorry. But you can always do better. Sorry, can't please everyone I guess. Link to post Share on other sites
extreme_right 3 Posted April 24, 2006 Report Share Posted April 24, 2006 Not bad, could be more varied issues. Link to post Share on other sites
progressivedem 2 Posted April 26, 2006 Report Share Posted April 26, 2006 I though this scenario was great -definately lived up to my expectations. Link to post Share on other sites
Natyjalm 0 Posted April 28, 2006 Report Share Posted April 28, 2006 progressivedem said: I though this scenario was great -definately lived up to my expectations. sorry Link to post Share on other sites
SaskGuy 16 Posted April 28, 2006 Report Share Posted April 28, 2006 You only say that because President Bush can't win I tried but it doesn't work out like real life where we got to invade Iraq so it's a really bad scenario it needs to be more realism. The US never got UN approval for the invasion, so it's quite realistic when you can't win as Bush. Link to post Share on other sites
Natyjalm 0 Posted April 28, 2006 Report Share Posted April 28, 2006 sorry Link to post Share on other sites
SaskGuy 16 Posted April 28, 2006 Report Share Posted April 28, 2006 You are a stupid hick if you think that because we went to war with Iraq so we did get U.N. approval and I think that you ought to get your facts straight. Good luck finding the subject and predicate in that grammatical mess. Link to post Share on other sites
Highland Call 0 Posted April 28, 2006 Report Share Posted April 28, 2006 You are a stupid hick if you think that because we went to war with Iraq so we did get U.N. approval and I think that you ought to get your facts straight. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_UN_Securi...nd_the_Iraq_war Read that Link to post Share on other sites
Natyjalm 0 Posted April 28, 2006 Report Share Posted April 28, 2006 sorry Link to post Share on other sites
hillary'08 0 Posted April 28, 2006 Report Share Posted April 28, 2006 edited stuff has to be approved by the wikipedia staff. so if the changes weren't true, they couldn't be posted. however, he probably didn't even change it. Link to post Share on other sites
alex xauw 1 Posted April 29, 2006 Report Share Posted April 29, 2006 You only say that because President Bush can't win I tried but it doesn't work out like real life where we got to invade Iraq so it's a really bad scenario it needs to be more realism. Well, in real life, a resolution to invade Iraq had not passed the Security Council so the Coalition invade unilaterally, which is the most likely situation to come of the scenario: the "Indecision" party wins and the Security council takes no action in regards to it. It is possible to win as Bush if you can take France, Russia, and China, and not lose US or UK, and the same is true for Chirac in the vice versa situation. The scenario is to decide whether the UN takes action regarding Iraq: the choice was between immediate invasion or continued inspections. The UN made no decision in real life, sorry if you don't like the truth. Link to post Share on other sites
Highland Call 0 Posted April 29, 2006 Report Share Posted April 29, 2006 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3661134.stm So, is the BBC or CBC wrong, http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/200...nnan040916.html Link to post Share on other sites
hillary'08 0 Posted April 29, 2006 Report Share Posted April 29, 2006 thank you guys for backing up the truth. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.