jj_frap 0 Posted October 2, 2004 Report Share Posted October 2, 2004 Why are Liberal and National treated as separate parties? Treat them like a freakin' coalition and add the bloody Democrats so that the game game would be more realistic. :-) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Cerebral Assassin 0 Posted October 2, 2004 Report Share Posted October 2, 2004 Party and leader graphics for the Australian Democrats are included, so a 2004 scenario involving Bartlett and Co shouldn't be too hard to make. You'd have to ensure that the game balance remained about the same, though; the starting scores would have to be adjusted to ensure that Dem preferences don't put Labor in too commanding a position. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Liberal_Democrat 0 Posted October 2, 2004 Report Share Posted October 2, 2004 Yeah but this would require A Lot of editing just to get to where we want. All I know is that Mark Latham would make a good PM over Howard. Sure Howards got the economic record but his position on Same Sex Marriage angers me, And yes Latham wants marriage between a man and a woman, but what I cannot believe is that Howard won't allow Gay Australians and believe me there are a lot of Gay Australians, To not adopt children. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jj_frap 0 Posted October 2, 2004 Author Report Share Posted October 2, 2004 There are countries in Europe that allow full civil unions that won't even allow same-sex couples to elect children. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.