Jump to content
270soft Forum

Green Party VP nominee Angela Walker


Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, admin_270 said:

Anyone with feedback about attributes? Regional bonuses?

We still need Gloria de la Riva, Rocky De La Fuente, and the Constitution Party included, given they truly represent vanguard, true Socialist Left, real pragmatic Moderate Centrist viewpoints, and actual, true Modern American traditional Social Conservative values, respectively, which are socio-political stances otherwise completely absent of all of all other candidates in the official 2020 scenario, and especially given Kanye West's vote share ended in their neighbourhood of EACH of these three in counted number

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Patine said:

We still need Gloria de la Riva, Rocky De La Fuente, and the Constitution Party included, given they truly represent vanguard, true Socialist Left, real pragmatic Moderate Centrist viewpoints, and actual, true Modern American traditional Social Conservative values, respectively, which are socio-political stances otherwise completely absent of all of all other candidates in the official 2020 scenario, and especially given Kanye West's vote share ended in their neighbourhood of EACH of these three in counted number

Quote

 

All interesting figures - but at this point, I'm not planning to add them to the official 2020.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, admin_270 said:

All interesting figures - but at this point, I'm not planning to add them to the official 2020.

Well, I then say your perspective is remiss and molded by mass media manipulators who all want to institutionally marginalize Third Party and Independent candidates and viewpoints  - the very same types you were just excoriating in your social media change thread (although the media manipulators are far more expansive and across the board than most people give credit for, because most today only call out media biases that target their viewpoints and tend to ignore, favour, or even declare are 'not biases,' those that support their viewpoint, but some with more clear views, like me, see all biases are there, intertwining and making everyone into fools). It's amazing how many different angle Big Brother blindsides you from, isn't it? Soon, you too will break down, crying, and admit, "1+1=3." I NEVER will! :P

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Patine said:

Well, I then say your perspective is remiss and molded by mass media manipulators who all want to institutionally marginalize Third Party and Independent candidates and viewpoints  - the very same types you were just excoriating in your social media change thread (although the media manipulators are far more expansive and across the board than most people give credit for, because most today only call out media biases that target their viewpoints and tend to ignore, favour, or even declare are 'not biases,' those that support their viewpoint, but some with more clear views, like me, see all biases are there, intertwining and making everyone into fools). It's amazing how many different angle Big Brother blindsides you from, isn't it? Soon, you too will break down, crying, and admit, "1+1=3." I NEVER will! :P

Not really - I've added the Constitution Party in the past. Just a matter of having time. You're welcome to release a modded campaign with those people and post it on the campaigns.270soft.com .

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, admin_270 said:

Not really - I've added the Constitution Party in the past. Just a matter of having time. You're welcome to release a modded campaign with those people and post it on the campaigns.270soft.com .

I would, if the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election as a whole interested me enough. There's a TONNE of other election scenario all over the world and through history that take priority on my personal interest and to-do list than one of six worst elections in terms of absolutely awful candidates for both major parties, and truly cheating any sort of possibility integrity and real, positive choice at all, from the results, along with 1852, 1920, 1968, 2004, and 2016.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...