Jump to content
270soft Forum

Judge Amy Coney Barrett Confirmation Thread


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Hestia11 said:

A recent British study backs you up. It also shows that those who had a mild case lose the antibodies faster than those who had a severe case of COVID.

The immune system is more complex than this - it's not just antibodies, but antibodies are a marker that you've had the disease.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Why would he wear a mask?

Rand Paul is Not wearing a mask on the Senate floor

Now I can only hope she is as independent as she claims to be. 

Posted Images

Yes, there are going to be people who are going to be dumb (just like those who wear masks, but leave their nose exposed.  Or their mouths. etc)

But people are still going to do actions that are going to increase exposure whether wearing masks is the norm or not.  And I'd rather that they wear the masks so it decreases their chances of infected other people.

Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, admin_270 said:

There have been 10s of millions of people who have gotten Covid-19 in the U.S. alone - hundreds of millions globally. This has been going on for ~10 months. If reinfection from the same strain were a major concern, there would be way more cases than this.

Yes, there are signs suggesting that for most people who've recovered there is immunity for some amount of months.  But this year is also the very first year humanity has seen this virus.  We're in uncharted territory  and there's a lot of information we don't know, and just how long this immunity will last is among those.  The immunity could last years for most people, or it could be that next month we start finding a lot more of those reinfection examples.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Defiant said:

The immunity could last years for most people, or it could be that next month we start finding a lot more of those reinfection examples.

Sure, but until then we have little evidence to believe reinfection is a significant concern at this point.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am curious to see her first decisions.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/26/2020 at 5:31 PM, Reagan04 said:

The Senate is imminently scheduled to vote on the confirmation of Judge Barrett as a Justice of the Supreme Court. You can watch the vote here:

 

Another betrayal of justice and judicial review in the United States as yet another, in a huge, long, and frankly, unacceptable, list of justices chosen for ideology and partisan patronage and spoils over qualities and achievements that really should be valued, is appointed. The vast majority of ruling of the Supreme Court, by the principals applied to lower courts, be considered dubious and up for easy challenge due to bias from the bench because of this focus on such appointments.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Patine said:

Another betrayal of justice and judicial review in the United States as yet another, in a huge, long, and frankly, unacceptable, list of justices chosen for ideology and partisan patronage and spoils over qualities and achievements that really should be valued, is appointed. The vast majority of ruling of the Supreme Court, by the principals applied to lower courts, be considered dubious and up for easy challenge due to bias from the bench because of this focus on such appointments.

k, nice to have you back

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...