As a long term approach, the response to coronavirus isn't sustainable and is almost certainly the wrong approach

[Wiw 92]

Oh, you know, being surrounded by doom and gloom, it gets people acting a little crazy!

[Anthony_270 958]

Ok guys, enough. Economy will come back. We're doing this to save perhaps 1-2% of our population. It's worth it.

A lot of people suddenly have staycations they weren't planning - that's ok.

Health professionals are learning, governments are learning, and individual citizens are learning. We are smart, viruses aren't. No virus has had the amount of firepower directed at it that this one is and will have for the next while.

In the long run, our economies will probably be stronger. 

p.s. If you have extra cash just sitting around, you might want to invest in the stock market right now. 

[Patine 513]

12 minutes ago, admin_270 said:

Ok guys, enough. Economy will come back. We're doing this to save perhaps 1-2% of our population. It's worth it.

A lot of people suddenly have staycations they weren't planning - that's ok.

Health professionals are learning, governments are learning, and individual citizens are learning. We are smart, viruses aren't. No virus has had the amount of firepower directed at it that this one is and will have for the next while.

In the long run, our economies will probably be stronger. 

p.s. If you have extra cash just sitting around, you might want to invest in the stock market right now. 

There's also a Stamford University Professor of Computer Science and Networking who also called it "the biggest mass stress test of the Internet's capacities since it's genesis."