jdm06ltd 0 Posted June 17, 2017 Report Share Posted June 17, 2017 CHALLENGE: Win the 2004 Election with Lincoln Chafee.... I beat Bush in the primaries having a Majority of delegates, and deafeated Wesley Clark in the General Elections 285-253. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Reagan04 658 Posted June 17, 2017 Report Share Posted June 17, 2017 28 minutes ago, jdm06ltd said: CHALLENGE: Win the 2004 Election with Lincoln Chafee.... I beat Bush in the primaries having a Majority of delegates, and deafeated Wesley Clark in the General Elections 285-253. I already did lol. In a landslide. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jdm06ltd 0 Posted June 17, 2017 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2017 @Reagan04 What was harder for you? Primaries or generals? The generals for me were easy I could have not done anything and won the generals....i barely edged Bush out in the primaries....it came down to the last state.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Reagan04 658 Posted June 17, 2017 Report Share Posted June 17, 2017 Just now, jdm06ltd said: @Reagan04 What was harder for you? Primaries or generals? The generals for me were easy I could have not done anything and won the generals....i barely edged Bush out in the primaries....it came down to the last state.... I was able to build up momentum in early states to crush Bush in the primaries, but it was hit or miss there. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jdm06ltd 0 Posted June 17, 2017 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2017 I won the first like 6 states against Bush, then he won like 10...then I won CA and NY, IL, PA, OH, most of the rest of New england and a few midwestern states...i won 21 states I think....bush won the rest and all the territories....but...it came dowm to the last state wich was Nebraska I think, I outworked Bush and wom by 3% and won by about 12 Delegates.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Bruce Fischer 0 Posted June 17, 2017 Report Share Posted June 17, 2017 2 hours ago, jdm06ltd said: @Reagan04 What was harder for you? Primaries or generals? The generals for me were easy I could have not done anything and won the generals....i barely edged Bush out in the primaries....it came down to the last state.... Don't take a general win for granted. I thought that about 1936 one time, I didn't campaign as FDR and Landon beat me with like 370 EVs Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted June 17, 2017 Report Share Posted June 17, 2017 Primaries are hard. General election victory is easy. I've won in a Chafee vs Kerry race winning everything but D.C. and getting 63% of the vote. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jdm06ltd 0 Posted June 17, 2017 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2017 @SirLagsalott Kerry was an inherintly awful candidate. Wesley Clark was tougher....i mean when I made it to the generals the Republicans were solidly ahead of the Democrats....Clark was in a no win situation....i hardly did a thing....i car about getting the "W" not it being a humiliation. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Patine 444 Posted June 18, 2017 Report Share Posted June 18, 2017 34 minutes ago, jdm06ltd said: @SirLagsalott Kerry was an inherintly awful candidate. Wesley Clark was tougher....i mean when I made it to the generals the Republicans were solidly ahead of the Democrats....Clark was in a no win situation....i hardly did a thing....i car about getting the "W" not it being a humiliation. Kerry had the problem that, even though his domestic policy was somewhat distinct from Bush, his foreign policy (the biggest part of that election) was almost identical to Bush's, just phrased a bit differently. That, and it was widely known they were both members of the same secret, politically-oriented fraternity, the Skull-and-Bones, Bush's incumbency bonus became absolutely huge, because Kerry wasn't much of an alternative - moreso a clone in many key areas. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jvikings1 39 Posted June 18, 2017 Report Share Posted June 18, 2017 1 hour ago, Patine said: Kerry had the problem that, even though his domestic policy was somewhat distinct from Bush, his foreign policy (the biggest part of that election) was almost identical to Bush's, just phrased a bit differently. That, and it was widely known they were both members of the same secret, politically-oriented fraternity, the Skull-and-Bones, Bush's incumbency bonus became absolutely huge, because Kerry wasn't much of an alternative - moreso a clone in many key areas. There was also this Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jdm06ltd 0 Posted June 19, 2017 Author Report Share Posted June 19, 2017 @jvikings1 A great ad. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jvikings1 39 Posted June 19, 2017 Report Share Posted June 19, 2017 6 hours ago, jdm06ltd said: @jvikings1 A great ad. I agree. The Bushes were always able to get great ad people. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.