Jump to content
270soft Forum

Feature You'd Most Like to See


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Reagan04 said:

I agree @QuickHead555 i also would like county results

Please, stop saying county results. I hear this over and over. If county results were implemented, it would practically be a death knell to any meaningful fan made scenarios. I am a staunch opponent of this feature, as someone who far prefers playing and making fan made scenarios over the "default" scenario. County results would be a monstrous and counter-productive feature in the long-term, and for little gain, ultimately.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

That's a pretty cool idea! It would be fun connecting with other campaigners for a game.

Certainly, but it is important to make sure the candidates all have reasonable shot at the money... at least some shot... Romney should have the edge...but it shouldn't be impossible for other candida

Good idea! Maybe you could also throw in Vice Presidential Interviews... you how much damage those did to Sarah Palin in 2008... I'd also like to see some ads on the Veeps. I know the McCain campaig

Posted Images

I mean, I want County Results, but I think it would have to be an option or something you can toggle on or off. That way it won't affect people who make scenarios.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@QH555,

Thanks for this feedback - noted.

@Reagan04 re counties,

Counties aren't planned. By congressional district might happen. NE and ME already have electoral college seats by CD. More generally, what would probably happen is a tertiary level would be introduced into President Infinity (similar to districts in Congress Infinity), and a campaign designer could decide to make this new level identical to the state level, or add in congressional districts, or counties, or whatever they wanted. We'll see.

Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, ThePotatoWalrus said:

If I wanted to make a scenario that had counties on it, would it be possible? Or would the counties be too small to click on?

I believe, as of right now, the US has over 5000 counties (or equivalents, such as independent cities in Virginia and a few other states, parishes in Louisiana, organized boroughs and the unorganized area in Alaska, and the District of Columbia itself), so that should answer your question there...

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Patine said:

I believe, as of right now, the US has over 5000 counties (or equivalents, such as independent cities in Virginia and a few other states, parishes in Louisiana, organized boroughs and the unorganized area in Alaska, and the District of Columbia itself), so that should answer your question there...

Lmao. Not that I was gonna make one. Ain't nobody got time fo dat.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Patine said:

I believe, as of right now, the US has over 5000 counties (or equivalents, such as independent cities in Virginia and a few other states, parishes in Louisiana, organized boroughs and the unorganized area in Alaska, and the District of Columbia itself), so that should answer your question there...

The number of county/county equivalents/cities is 3,144 by the way.

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, lok1999 said:

The number of county/county equivalents/cities is 3,144 by the way.

It would still be basically impossible to realistically or practically do a county-based federal US election. My point still stands.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

Not so much a feature, but can we make it easier to enter and edit polls?  If I need to edit, I have to scroll down through a list of 100 names to find the candidate I need to change.  Couldn't we just click on the polling window and enter a new number, or even import poll data from a CSV?  Having to constantly scroll up and down that list makes entering poll data a painstaking process

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/2/2016 at 4:44 PM, ThePotatoWalrus said:

Lmao. Not that I was gonna make one. Ain't nobody got time fo dat.

 

 

On 10/2/2016 at 11:07 PM, Patine said:

It would still be basically impossible to realistically or practically do a county-based federal US election. My point still stands.

That gives me another idea - a way to zoom into the map perhaps?  This would also help when in momentum view.

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, servo75 said:

 

 

That gives me another idea - a way to zoom into the map perhaps?  This would also help when in momentum view.

It would still kill fan-made scenarios going forward if counties were a factor that had to be accounted for, ESPECIALLY if zoom-in features demanded county maps, making historical and non-US Presidential (that is, State Gubernatorial, Senatorial, City Mayoral, and foreign Presidential) near impossible, or at least ridiculously difficult and taxing, far moreseo than they should be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still I'd hate to be the one who has to draw that map :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, admin_270 said:

@servo75

"Couldn't we just click on the polling window and enter a new number"

Do you mean click on the list box on the right side of the poll screen, that displays the already entered candidate %s for that poll?

Yes that's what I meant.  As opposed to having to scroll through the entire list, we could click on "Trump  50%" to change the value directly

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/2/2016 at 11:07 PM, Patine said:

It would still be basically impossible to realistically or practically do a county-based federal US election. My point still stands.

Exactly.  Especially with being unable to zoom in and click on the counties.  I know that even Congress Infinity gives me headaches with having to manage 435 regions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a feature, but I'd like to request more user-friendly error handling.  There's nothing more frustrating than getting halfway through a game and getting that dreaded "Access Violation at..." message, then the game sort of crashes but the window stays open... and we have no idea what's going on.  Maybe catch the more common errors and have a message like "ERROR:  No candidate id found for Tim Smith." or "ERROR: Issue doesn't exist."

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, servo75 said:

Not a feature, but I'd like to request more user-friendly error handling.  There's nothing more frustrating than getting halfway through a game and getting that dreaded "Access Violation at..." message, then the game sort of crashes but the window stays open... and we have no idea what's going on.  Maybe catch the more common errors and have a message like "ERROR:  No candidate id found for Tim Smith." or "ERROR: Issue doesn't exist."

That would be nice.

Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, Patine said:

I will certainly agree with you both there...

Alternatively, implement some sort of log file that keeps track of events in the game (not the political events). Something like the following...

Started game...
Creating maps...
Loading issues...
* ERROR * UNABLE TO LOAD ISSUE "abortion" - missing image.

Today I was making some major updates to a campaign, then when testing it in a simulation, I suddenly got a crash message and had to go into Task Manager to close.  Couldn't figure out why.  After trial and error, I deleted the new campaign and started over, losing two hours worth of work.  I kept track of changes I made this time and after a long time, finally isolated the problem to something wrong with a new "Issue" I added to the campaign.  I still have no idea what was wrong with it, but I deleted the two new issues and now it works again.  But I have no idea why adding those campaign issues should cause the entire thing to crash with no explanation, requiring Ctrl-Alt-Delete.  Something like the above file would help us see why it's crashing and what we can do to correct it.  Mine was probably some teeny picky problem like a bad text character, but for the entire thing to crash with no explanation - IMHO I think that should be the first priority, even if other features need to wait.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Patine said:

I will certainly agree with you both there...

Finally something we can agree on.  Who says we can't come to consensus? :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...