Prometheus 3 Posted May 5, 2011 Report Share Posted May 5, 2011 With only two years to go, the next German federal election already promises to be exciting: The last four years saw a lot of political upheavel. With Merkel's government facing a heavy majority in the Bundesrat, an unprecedent number of cabinet shuffles and serious infighting in the CDU/CSU' coalition partner FDP, the only uplifting fact for Merkel is that the opposition is not in a better shape. With the SPD struggling to redefine their program and an having an unpopular leader and the Left party suffering several lossel in recent state elections both parties have to try hard to improve their result from last time. Only the Greens are optimistic that they can improve their results from last time and make political gains. The start of a difficult campaign for the Social Democrats. But they are hoping that Steinbrück's popularity will bring them a victory After 8 weeks of campaigning, the SPD is the largest party and can form a majority coalition with the Green party With the popular Joshka Fischer as candidate for chancellor, the Greens manage to get the second best election result Comment with your Email and I'll send it to you. Feedback is appreciated 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
NYCDEMS 1 Posted May 5, 2011 Report Share Posted May 5, 2011 Looks great. Can't wait to try it. mdlevy85@gmail.com Thanks! 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gopprogressive 1,063 Posted May 5, 2011 Report Share Posted May 5, 2011 I'm interested. Kurtsg@umich.edu 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mz452 20 Posted May 5, 2011 Report Share Posted May 5, 2011 matty1019@yahoo.com 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Patine 469 Posted May 6, 2011 Report Share Posted May 6, 2011 chandallah@netscape.net 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
thetrotsky 3 Posted May 9, 2011 Report Share Posted May 9, 2011 Love German scenarions. Could you send me a copy thewhorock93@hotmail.co.uk 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gopprogressive 1,063 Posted May 11, 2011 Report Share Posted May 11, 2011 I was wondering if you wouldn't mind some edits to your scenario. For one thing, I think the Saarland should be more left-wing on economics and others than the Rhineland, and Berlin (and Hamburg) should be CL on Immigration (Rheinland should be C). Also, Mecklenberg-Vorpommern should be more conservative then Niedersachsen. Do you agree with these changes? I'll also fix the issues as well. I'd remove Afghanistan as an issue and replace it with NATO or Defense. I'll look at the others as well. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
normanwisdomii 1 Posted May 11, 2011 Report Share Posted May 11, 2011 I wonder if you could send on normanwisdomii@hotmail.co.uk Loving Germany at the moment must admit Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Prometheus 3 Posted May 12, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 12, 2011 I was wondering if you wouldn't mind some edits to your scenario. For one thing, I think the Saarland should be more left-wing on economics and others than the Rhineland, and Berlin (and Hamburg) should be CL on Immigration (Rheinland should be C). Also, Mecklenberg-Vorpommern should be more conservative then Niedersachsen. Do you agree with these changes? I'll also fix the issues as well. I'd remove Afghanistan as an issue and replace it with NATO or Defense. I'll look at the others as well. Thanks for the feedback. Re: Saarland I agree Re: Immigration: I'm not sure. I think Rhineland would definitly be C and Berlin rather CL. Hamburg I would leave at C because of the recent rise of several populist right-wing parties in the city. (The Schill-Party for example) Re: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern: I think Niedersachsen is quite conservative. There are a lot of catholics there and the quite conservative. In Mecklenburg-Vorpommern on the other hand has left-leaning governments for some time now and all parties even the CDU are quite progressive. So I'd leave like that. Re: Afghanistan: It depends a lot wether there are still troops in Afghanistan by then. If they are not NATO would probably be no issue, but I'll probably change it into Defense 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gopprogressive 1,063 Posted May 12, 2011 Report Share Posted May 12, 2011 Thanks for the feedback. Re: Saarland I agree Re: Immigration: I'm not sure. I think Rhineland would definitly be C and Berlin rather CL. Hamburg I would leave at C because of the recent rise of several populist right-wing parties in the city. (The Schill-Party for example) Re: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern: I think Niedersachsen is quite conservative. There are a lot of catholics there and the quite conservative. In Mecklenburg-Vorpommern on the other hand has left-leaning governments for some time now and all parties even the CDU are quite progressive. So I'd leave like that. Re: Afghanistan: It depends a lot wether there are still troops in Afghanistan by then. If they are not NATO would probably be no issue, but I'll probably change it into Defense Ah, really with Niedersachsen? It's usually stronger for the SPD and I think stayed with them in 2005. Plus, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern went for the CDU/CSU in 2005 and 2009. Good to know about Hamburg, although it has a big immigrant population and also voted heavily SPD in 2011 so I'd still put it as CL. I'll post the regional changes when I'm finished. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gopprogressive 1,063 Posted May 13, 2011 Report Share Posted May 13, 2011 How is this for the 2005 and 2009 scenarios? // each region should have 18 regional center values // 1 means the regional center is 1' date=' 5 that it is 5 // acceptable values are 1-5 // Armed Forces Reform // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // German-American Relations // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget //Schleswig-Holstein // Armed Forces Reform 3 // Consumer Protection 3 // Corporate Responsibility 3 // Economy 4 // Education 3 // Eastern Recovery 3 // Energy 4 // Environment 4 // Europe 3 // Family 4 // German-American Relations 4 // Immigration 3 // Internal Security 4 // Jobs 4 // Military Intervention 4 // Public Health Reform 4 // Social Security 3 // Tax and Budget 3 //Mecklenburg-Vorpommern // Armed Forces Reform // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // German-American Relations // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 3 3 3 4 3 1 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 //Niedersachsen // Armed Forces Reform // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // German-American Relations // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 3 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 4 2 3 4 3 2 2 3 3 2 //Sachsen-Anhalt // Armed Forces Reform // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // German-American Relations // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 3 2 1 4 3 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 //Brandenburg // Armed Forces Reform // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // German-American Relations // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 3 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 4 2 3 4 3 2 2 3 3 2 //Berlin // Armed Forces Reform // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // German-American Relations // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 2 2 4 2 2 2 3 2 2 //Nordrhein-Westfalen // Armed Forces Reform // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // German-American Relations // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 3 2 3 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 //Hessen // Armed Forces Reform // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // German-American Relations // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 //Thüringen // Armed Forces Reform // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // German-American Relations // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 3 3 2 4 3 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 //Sachsen // Armed Forces Reform // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // German-American Relations // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 3 2 2 4 3 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 //Rheinland-Pfalz // Armed Forces Reform // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // German-American Relations // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 3 4 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 2 //Saarland // Armed Forces Reform // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // German-American Relations // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 //Bayern // Armed Forces Reform // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // German-American Relations // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 //Baden-Württemberg // Armed Forces Reform // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // German-American Relations // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 //Hamburg // Armed Forces Reform // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // German-American Relations // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 //Bremen // Armed Forces Reform // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // German-American Relations // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 2[/quote'] // each region should have 18 regional center values// 1 means the regional center is 1' date=' 5 that it is 5 // acceptable values are 1-5 // Data Privacy* // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // Technology* // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget //Schleswig-Holstein // Data Privacy 3 // Consumer Protection 3 // Corporate Responsibility 3 // Economy 4 // Education 3 // Eastern Recovery 3 // Energy 4 // Environment 4 // Europe 3 // Family 4 // Technology 4 // Immigration 3 // Internal Security 4 // Jobs 4 // Military Intervention 4 // Public Health Reform 4 // Social Security 3 // Tax and Budget 3 //Mecklenburg-Vorpommern // Data Privacy // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // Technology // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 3 3 3 4 3 1 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 //Niedersachsen // Data Privacy // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // Technology // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 3 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 //Sachsen-Anhalt // Data Privacy // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // Technology // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 3 2 1 4 3 1 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 //Brandenburg // Data Privacy // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // Technology // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 3 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 4 2 3 4 3 2 2 3 3 2 //Berlin // Data Privacy // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // Technology // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 //Nordrhein-Westfalen // Data Privacy // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // Technology // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 3 2 3 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 //Hessen // Data Privacy // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // Technology // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 //Thüringen // Data Privacy // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // Technology // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 3 3 2 4 3 1 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 //Sachsen // Data Privacy // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // Technology // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 3 2 2 4 3 1 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 //Rheinland-Pfalz // Data Privacy // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // Technology // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 //Saarland // Data Privacy // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // Technology // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 3 4 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 //Bayern // Data Privacy // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // Technology // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 //Baden-Württemberg // Data Privacy // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // Technology // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 //Hamburg // Data Privacy // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // Technology // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 3 2 4 4 4 4 3 3 //Bremen // Data Privacy // Consumer Protection // Corporate Responsibility // Economy // Education // Eastern Recovery // Energy // Environment // Europe // Family // Technology // Immigration // Internal Security // Jobs // Military Intervention // Public Health Reform // Social Security // Tax and Budget 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 2[/quote'] 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gopprogressive 1,063 Posted May 21, 2011 Report Share Posted May 21, 2011 How about these for issues in 2013? I need one more. Budget and Debt Economy Education Energy Environment Europe Family Financial Crisis Foreign Policy Immigration Internal Security Islam Jobs Public Health Reform Social Security Tax Policy Turkey 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Prometheus 3 Posted May 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 22, 2011 How is this for the 2005 and 2009 scenarios? How about these for issues in 2013? I need one more. Budget and Debt Economy Education Energy Environment Europe Family Financial Crisis Foreign Policy Immigration Internal Security Islam Jobs Public Health Reform Social Security Tax Policy Turkey Most of the Eastern German states are siginficantly more left wing on economic issues. Not so much on social issues. As I said earlier already Lower Saxony is fairly conservative. Only the large cities are leaning left. For the 2013 scenario Direct Democracy could be more of an issue. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
matvail2002 803 Posted May 22, 2011 Report Share Posted May 22, 2011 matvail2002@gmail.com Thanks a lot! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gopprogressive 1,063 Posted May 29, 2011 Report Share Posted May 29, 2011 Most of the Eastern German states are siginficantly more left wing on economic issues. Not so much on social issues. As I said earlier already Lower Saxony is fairly conservative. Only the large cities are leaning left. For the 2013 scenario Direct Democracy could be more of an issue. To be fair, there are events that shift the electorate to the left. What issues do you think should be strongest for the CDU, SPD, FDP, Greens, and Left? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
owenb1991 1 Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 Looks a good scenario, send it to owenisgood@hotmail.co.uk! cheers Quote Link to post Share on other sites
CCA 4 Posted July 6, 2011 Report Share Posted July 6, 2011 hfrancisco2006@gmail.com please Quote Link to post Share on other sites
owenb1991 1 Posted December 7, 2011 Report Share Posted December 7, 2011 owenisgood@hotmail.co.uk Quote Link to post Share on other sites
LordBeckett 29 Posted December 7, 2011 Report Share Posted December 7, 2011 I would like it at padams0511@gmail.com 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Prometheus 3 Posted February 3, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 3, 2012 I'm completely reworking this scenario. I'll let you know when I'm done. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gopprogressive 1,063 Posted February 3, 2012 Report Share Posted February 3, 2012 I'm completely reworking this scenario. I'll let you know when I'm done. Cool, need any help? 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Prometheus 3 Posted February 7, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 7, 2012 Probably I'll put some finishing touches to Berlin - 2011 and then I'll start with this one. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ike09 4 Posted July 25, 2012 Report Share Posted July 25, 2012 Great! ike09@live.nl Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ColombiaPF 2 Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 if you are changing the scenario i will like to know if you can add the NPD and the MLPD who are the to far right and left partis the NPD IS far right party many of them are neo-nazi and nationalist they don't had to many voters but they had representation in Sajonia and Meckelemburg there they had 6% of the vots so it will very interesting to found the two extremist in the election NPD lider is Holger Apfel and MLPD is Stephan Engel Good look Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ike09 4 Posted August 8, 2012 Report Share Posted August 8, 2012 looks good indeed ike09@live.nl Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.