danieldlmn 0 Posted April 29, 2011 Author Report Share Posted April 29, 2011 gun Control (Far-left) Ban all guns (left)We need gun control! Ban certain guns. Require registration/background checks. Gun control is a national security issues! (center left) The right to bear arm is in the constitution, but only responsible law biding citzen should own gun with the requirement of registration/background checks. Ban assault rifles, (center)Gun control is a state issue. Responsible gun ownership is fine. (Center right)We should be wary of gun control. The Second Amendment protects the right to bear arms. (right)Gun ownership is constitutionally protected. Protect sportsmen rights and the Second Amendment. (far right)The Second Amendment is not negotiable. No restrictions on firearms. still need help on china if anyone want help? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
danieldlmn 0 Posted April 29, 2011 Author Report Share Posted April 29, 2011 Health care (Far left)support the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act but doesnt goes far enough. Health care is a right! (left)support the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Health care is right! (Center left)the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act isnt prefect bill but it get the job done. Require health insurance for every child (Center)Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act goes too far and need to be change with additional legislation. (center right)Repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and replace it with new bill! Give health coverage to uninsured children (right)Repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and replace it with new bill! Tax credits for personal Health Savings (far right) Repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and replace it with new bill! The health care system should be completely private. How do position sound for this issue? cuz going be one important issue of 2012 election Quote Link to post Share on other sites
danieldlmn 0 Posted May 1, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 1, 2011 homeland security (far-left) prepare for natural disasters and no infringement on civil liberties Return home all U.S. troops home! (left)we need to be more respectful to other nations they would respect us in return. build our credibility again. tighten security in our open boarders. (Center left)prepare for terrorist attack. Increase some security, funding for natural disasters. let all aspect of the patriot act expire. (Center)Homeland security is a priority, balance between natural disaster relief and anti-terrorism. Missile shield doesnt work and creates hostility among our allies! (center right)Homeland security is an important priority. Focus on fighting terrorism but also provide disaster relief funding. (right)Homeland security should be our 1st priority, regardless of terror alert level. Missile shield will work. Renew Patriot Act. (far right)Homeland security is foremost priority. Tighter airport surveillance and security. Make Patriot Act permanent. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
danieldlmn 0 Posted May 3, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 3, 2011 immigration (far left)oppose Arizona immigration law. Completely open borders. unlimited amount immigration. (left) oppose Arizona immigration law. Immigration is great! The more immigrants the better. Just require a criminal record check. Full amnesty for illegals. (center left)Legal immigration is great. Support guest-worker program for illegals and amnesty. (center)Enforce current laws and tighter border security but allow room for a guest-worker program. (center right)Illegal immigration is a serious problem. Tighter border security. tougher immigration laws. (right)Support Arizona immigration law. Tighten border security with stricter immigration enforcement provisions. Deport illegal immigrants (Far Right)The federal government need get serious about immigration. The federal government should model Arizona immigration law. Am going need help with both China and the Afghanistan issues if anyone want to help please? Cause now that Bin laden dead it need be reworked Quote Link to post Share on other sites
danieldlmn 0 Posted May 3, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 3, 2011 immigration (far left)oppose Arizona immigration law. Completely open borders. unlimited amount immigration. (left) oppose Arizona immigration law. Immigration is great! The more immigrants the better. Just require a criminal record check. Full amnesty for illegals. (center left)Legal immigration is great. Support guest-worker program for illegals and amnesty. (center)Enforce current laws and tighter border security but allow room for a guest-worker program. (center right)Illegal immigration is a serious problem. Tighter border security. tougher immigration laws. (right)Support Arizona immigration law. Tighten border security with stricter immigration enforcement provisions. Deport illegal immigrants (Far Right)The federal government need get serious about immigration. The federal government should model Arizona immigration law. Am going need help with both China and the Afghanistan issues if anyone want to help please? Cause now that Bin laden dead it need be reworked Quote Link to post Share on other sites
danieldlmn 0 Posted May 3, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 3, 2011 nuclear proliferation (far left)Nuclear weapons are a problem and we need to lead on the issues by drawing down our nuclear stockpile. Support the nuclear treaty with Russia. Deal with Iran and North Korea through the UN. (Left)deal with Iran and Korea through the UN. Nuclear proliferation is in the best interest of the world security. Support the nuclear treaty with Russia. (Center left)Diplomacy and economic sanctions should make Iran and North Korea see things our way. Support the Nuclear Treaty with Russia. (center)Open talk with Iran and North Korea. Go war as a last resort. The nuclear treaty with Russia isn't prefect but it work. (Center Right)We should prepare to attack Iran and North Korea if we find they have Nuclear weapons. The treaty with Russia need to be amended. (right)We should launch a pre-emptive attack on Iran and North Korea to destroy all potential nuclear sites. nuclear weapons are in our national interested (Far right)Iran and North Korea have troubled us long enough. Launch a full-fledged attack and invade them. oppose the nuclear treaty with Russia. I dont know if have this issues spot on but I would like to hear your feed back Quote Link to post Share on other sites
danieldlmn 0 Posted May 4, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 4, 2011 Afghanistan (far-left)Osama Bin Laden is dead. our mission is done. leave Afghanistan. bring our troop home now. (left)Osama Bin Laden is dead. leave it to NATO and UN to deal with the situation in Afghanistan. withdraw all American troop at once (Center left)Osama Bin Laden is dead. justice has been served. Begin pulling out our combat troops gradually. stay on the timeline for full withdraw. (center)our job is done bring in NATO and UN for peace keeping. We should seek a multilateral solution. (center right)Osama Bin Laden may be dead but our job isnt done. we must continue the fight against the terrorist. (right)Osama Bin Laden may be dead but the fight isnt over. Hunt for terrorists and insurgents. (far right)Osama Bin Laden may be dead but the fight isnt over. we must keep our troop there to hunt the terrorist down. don't know if have this spot on so give me feed back Quote Link to post Share on other sites
danieldlmn 0 Posted May 4, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 4, 2011 am making progress... who would you guy like see on vp list? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Abe Lincoln 9 Posted May 4, 2011 Report Share Posted May 4, 2011 I sure would Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ayamo 19 Posted May 5, 2011 Report Share Posted May 5, 2011 What a question Quote Link to post Share on other sites
danieldlmn 0 Posted May 5, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 5, 2011 well think about it and give me list of names lol... am in process of updating [population for each state... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ayamo 19 Posted May 5, 2011 Report Share Posted May 5, 2011 Reps: Allen West Nikki Haley Marco Rubio Scott Walker Susana Martinez Pat Toomey Brian Sandoval Chris Christie Bob McDonnel Mark Kirk Scott Brown Dems: Gov O'Malley (forgot the name) Debbie Wassermann-Schultz Chris van Hollen Ted Strickland Andrew Cuomo Chuck Schumer Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Actinguy 862 Posted May 6, 2011 Report Share Posted May 6, 2011 I significantly altered the VP list in RZ's scenario, here's what I came up with: Dems: Joe Biden Reps: Nikki Haley Rob Portman Bob McDonnell Rick Perry Jim DeMint John Thune Jan Brewer Butch Otter Sam Brownback Bobby Jindal Haley Barbour Dave Heineman Chris Christie Jon Kyl Johnny Isakson Mike Crapo Dan Coats Mitch McConnell Olympia Snowe Susan Collins Mike Johanns Lindsey Graham Kay Bailey Hutchinson John Cornyn Mike Enzi Obviously some of these are more likely than others...and some might well refuse if they were offered...but these are the names that fit my requirements (at least four years in office, appealing either to moderates or the party base, did not have an obvious problem (had to delete a few names for racist remarks, etc, that would be bad in general but especially in trying to defeat the first black president), and under 72 years old. Don't add presidential candidates to the list. For example, if Mitt Romney is on your president and vice president lists, then Mitt Romney can choose Mitt Romney as his VP. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Actinguy 862 Posted May 6, 2011 Report Share Posted May 6, 2011 Looking at Ayamo's Republican list, many of them have been in office for less than 5 months. Republicans tore into Obama for being in office for three years. Their biggest argument against Obama was his inexperience...and then they turned around and nominated a VP who had only been in office for TWO years. They're not going to make that mistake again. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Actinguy 862 Posted May 6, 2011 Report Share Posted May 6, 2011 I could also see potentially adding these Reps: Joe Lieberman Charlie Crist Tom Ridge Eric Cantor Paul Ryan Carly Fiorina Condoleeza Rice Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Patine 444 Posted May 6, 2011 Report Share Posted May 6, 2011 I could also see potentially adding these Reps: Joe Lieberman Charlie Crist Tom Ridge Eric Cantor Paul Ryan Carly Fiorina Condoleeza Rice Since when is Lieberman a Republican? He may be a hawk, but he's firmly in the Democratic caucus, if not party, and has recently reconciled with the Dems. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Actinguy 862 Posted May 7, 2011 Report Share Posted May 7, 2011 Since when is Lieberman a Republican? He may be a hawk, but he's firmly in the Democratic caucus, if not party, and has recently reconciled with the Dems. True, however, McCain desperately wanted Lieberman in 2008. He ended up picking Palin after his aides vetoed Lieberman (for being too moderate like McCain, rather than strengthening the party base (McCain's weak point and Palin's strength.) Lieberman is unlikely, but it comes down to whoever the candidate is. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
danieldlmn 0 Posted May 15, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 15, 2011 mike huckabee is out this just made secnario interesting and difficult at same time Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Political 21 Posted May 15, 2011 Report Share Posted May 15, 2011 leave him in, but off Quote Link to post Share on other sites
POLLWONK 375 Posted May 16, 2011 Report Share Posted May 16, 2011 Move down Bachmann to tier 2...move Gingrich to tier 1...move Hunstman Jr. to tier 2. Drop Palin to tier 3...bump Daniels and Pawlenty to tier 2. This my list and tell me what you think... Republican (Front runner) Former Governor Mike Huckabee of Arkansas Former Governor Mitt Romney Representative Michele Bachmann of Minnesota 2ndtier Former Governor Sarah Palin of Alaska Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich of Georgia Representative Ron Paul of Texas Businessman Donald Trump of New York 3rdtier Former Governor Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota Governor Haley Barbour of Mississippi Governor Mitch Daniels of Indiana Governor Haley Barbour of Mississippi Former United States Ambassador to China Jon Huntsman, Jr. of Utah Former Governor Buddy Roemer of Louisiana and remember am only allowed to have 16 candidates in each party 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
POLLWONK 375 Posted May 16, 2011 Report Share Posted May 16, 2011 China Far-Left: China is our firm ally who means only good for us. Left: China is an ally who the US must learn to cooperate with more. Center-Left: Work diplomatically to establish closer ties with Beijing. Boost trust between the two nations. Center: Keep our relations with China as is. Center-Right: Take a tougher stance on China's Human Rights violations. Work diplomatically to solve these issues. Right: China is an oppresor of its people. Defend Taiwan and prepare to repel the push of the Chinese government. Far-Right: We should invade China and set up a democratic government. gun Control (Far-left) Ban all guns (left)We need gun control! Ban certain guns. Require registration/background checks. Gun control is a national security issues! (center left) The right to bear arm is in the constitution, but only responsible law biding citzen should own gun with the requirement of registration/background checks. Ban assault rifles, (center)Gun control is a state issue. Responsible gun ownership is fine. (Center right)We should be wary of gun control. The Second Amendment protects the right to bear arms. (right)Gun ownership is constitutionally protected. Protect sportsmen rights and the Second Amendment. (far right)The Second Amendment is not negotiable. No restrictions on firearms. still need help on china if anyone want help? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
POLLWONK 375 Posted May 16, 2011 Report Share Posted May 16, 2011 by the way, when are you going to release this??? POLLWONK 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
danieldlmn 0 Posted May 17, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 17, 2011 am guessing june but no promises right now am working on updating the endorse such as Governor and Senators.... am also waiting on polls to start coming out without huckabee name in them to see where his support goes.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Political 21 Posted May 17, 2011 Report Share Posted May 17, 2011 I would include Trump/Huckabee only "off" Quote Link to post Share on other sites
POLLWONK 375 Posted May 18, 2011 Report Share Posted May 18, 2011 I agree. Huckabee seemed almost certain to run up until earlier this year. Trump managed to fool everyone into thinking he was running. I would keep both... I would include Trump/Huckabee only "off" Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.