Paltin 2 Posted October 3, 2010 Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 Alright, so I'm hoping to start working on a 1948 scenario. Here are some candidates: Republican: Thomas Dewey Robert Taft Harold E. Stassen Earl Warren Douglas MacArthur Dwight D. Eisenhower (Off by Default) Democratic: Harry Truman Dwight D. Eisenhower (Off by Default) Alben Barkley Richard Russell Jr. Dixiecrat: Strom Thurmond Progressive (Off by Default): Henry Wallace Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Red Dog Democrat 9 Posted October 3, 2010 Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 Don't forget Henry Wallace. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Paltin 2 Posted October 4, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 4, 2010 Don't forget Henry Wallace. Added. Now, some issue help would be most appreciated... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mahaadoxyz 9 Posted October 4, 2010 Report Share Posted October 4, 2010 Fair Deal Labor Cold War Nuclear Weapons Marshall Plan? Internationalism/UN? Civil Rights Communism (HUAC) New Deal/Social Security Health Care China? Korea? Those are some ideas. The tricky part, of course, will be letting Truman make his massive comeback over the last couple of weeks. Apparently there was an event where movie theaters played films from each campaign, and Dewey's flopped but Truman's was highly effective. Maybe that could be a scripted event, or something? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Red Dog Democrat 9 Posted October 4, 2010 Report Share Posted October 4, 2010 Of course, you can also include the "Is Dewey Counting His Chickens Before They Hatch?" Event. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lahbas 4 Posted October 17, 2010 Report Share Posted October 17, 2010 Some notes on my part: - Eisenhower should be a off candidate for both the Republicans and the Democrats. He was courted by both parties, but more seriously by the Drop-Truman movement within the Democratic Party. - Alben Barkley could be placed as a Democratic Candidate, though with extremely low support. After his keynote address, there was talk of possibly nominating him rather than Truman. Of course it came to nothing, and it would be difficult, but a skillful player could pull it off. - Richard Russell Jr. must be placed in opposition to Truman. He is the candidate of the Southern Democrats that remained loyal and did not split off with Thurmond and the more extreme Dixiecrats. While strong, he would have a very difficult time making headway out of the south in finding support for his candidacy. Again, a skillful player "could" get him nominated, but it would not be easy. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Paltin 2 Posted October 19, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 Some notes on my part: - Eisenhower should be a off candidate for both the Republicans and the Democrats. He was courted by both parties, but more seriously by the Drop-Truman movement within the Democratic Party. - Alben Barkley could be placed as a Democratic Candidate, though with extremely low support. After his keynote address, there was talk of possibly nominating him rather than Truman. Of course it came to nothing, and it would be difficult, but a skillful player could pull it off. - Richard Russell Jr. must be placed in opposition to Truman. He is the candidate of the Southern Democrats that remained loyal and did not split off with Thurmond and the more extreme Dixiecrats. While strong, he would have a very difficult time making headway out of the south in finding support for his candidacy. Again, a skillful player "could" get him nominated, but it would not be easy. Added. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
wrestlingking235 2 Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 Henry Wallace shouldn't be off by default. he cost Truman some critical electoral votes. if he and Thurmond hadn't run, Truman would've won of the the biggest upsets ever Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Paltin 2 Posted October 22, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 22, 2010 Henry Wallace shouldn't be off by default. he cost Truman some critical electoral votes. if he and Thurmond hadn't run, Truman would've won of the the biggest upsets ever http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ElectoralCollege1948.svg Henry Wallace won absolutely no states. Please do your research next time. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MrBlonde 0 Posted October 22, 2010 Report Share Posted October 22, 2010 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ElectoralCollege1948.svg Henry Wallace won absolutely no states. Please do your research next time. Example: New York: 46% for Dewey, 45% for Truman, 8.3% for Wallace. Wallace did cost Truman Electoral Votes and could have cost him more, see California and Ohio. Do your search next time. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
wrestlingking235 2 Posted October 23, 2010 Report Share Posted October 23, 2010 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ElectoralCollege1948.svg Henry Wallace won absolutely no states. Please do your research next time. I never said Wallace won any states. The 48' election is my favorite moment in electoral history, so I do like to know my stuff. I just finished reading David McCullough's epic biography of Truman, and the 48' election is covered quite in depth. Truman should have a really high stamina as he was giving tons of speeches a day to the point he was going horse at the end. And one issue suggestion might be the "Do nothing" 80th Congress. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Mrdie 2 Posted October 28, 2010 Report Share Posted October 28, 2010 Probably a good idea to give Wallace an integrity of 2 to reflect his then-sympathetic views towards the USSR and the Communist Party USA endorsing his candidacy. Plenty of scandal potential there. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.