mz452 Posted April 21, 2010 Share Posted April 21, 2010 Matty1019@yahoo.com 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahaadoxyz Posted April 21, 2010 Share Posted April 21, 2010 hurricanexyz@mail.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treasurer Posted April 21, 2010 Share Posted April 21, 2010 GOP, there's a lack of clarity with some of the candidates photos, which could be better. Good choice of alternative candidates. Gameplay as Labour was pretty good. Had about a 10 seat lead with over 2 weeks lefts, until I was running low on finances. The Sun should at least be leaning Conservative, and so should the Express, not leaning to Labour. thetrotsky, my email is treasurerofthepc@yahoo.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gopprogressive Posted April 22, 2010 Author Share Posted April 22, 2010 Fixed the NI ridings issues to increase accuracy and merged the TUV with Veritas instead of UKIP. Anyone who wants it just say. Thank you. Please send this to me and TheorySpark ( http://www.theoryspark.com/interact/contact.htm ). Yeah, I'll admit the NI ridings are the weakest part due to a lack of polling and other information. The official scenario also fixes the photo issue clarity. And I have fixed the endorsers with The Times being undecided and the Sun leaning Conservative. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gopprogressive Posted April 22, 2010 Author Share Posted April 22, 2010 All right, I did a playthrough as Nick Clegg of the Lib-Dems. I managed to get 22% of the vote but only 55 seats, which did seem a bit low (chiefly because I ran out of money- the tories won the election as they were like 1 or 2 seats short of a majority). Do you guys think I should give the Lib-Dems more money, or does 50% of Labour's (and 42% of the Tories) seem accurate? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treasurer Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I would just stay where you are on the finances. Without the surge from the debates, the Lib Dems would've probably flatlined at the election, and lose a good handful of their seats. So seems accurate to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gopprogressive Posted April 22, 2010 Author Share Posted April 22, 2010 I would just stay where you are on the finances. Without the surge from the debates, the Lib Dems would've probably flatlined at the election, and lose a good handful of their seats. So seems accurate to me. Fair enough, and we'll see how the rest of the election pans out (I heard Clegg and the LD's are having anemic fundraising despite "Clegg-mania"). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treasurer Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I'm wondering also, if Labour and Conservative finances are down too, with it being the recession and the expenses scandal. Plus, with the emphasis on cuts and paying off the national debt, it's not really a good idea to break the bank with a new record of campaign expenses. I might be wrong though, when the figures come out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahaadoxyz Posted April 23, 2010 Share Posted April 23, 2010 I played through as Clegg and got about 27% and 115ish seats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ste Posted April 25, 2010 Share Posted April 25, 2010 Any chance you could send your new version to me at red_ste@msn.com? I will play and give feedback of course. Many thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.