matvail2002 Posted September 22, 2009 Share Posted September 22, 2009 1908: New Party vs Liberal vs. Socialist Labour 1912: New Party vs. Liberal vs. Socialist Labour 1916: New Party vs. Liberal vs. Socialist 1920: Anti-Socialist Front vs. Socialist vs. Communist 1924: Conservative vs. Liberal vs. Socialist vs. Communist 1928: Conservative vs. Liberal vs. Socialist 1932: Coalition vs. Communist vs. National Front 1936: Coalition vs. National Fascist Front vs. Communist 1945: Social Credit vs. Popular Front vs. Liberal 1950: Social Credit vs. Popular Front vs. Liberal 1955: Social Credit vs. Liberal vs. SDP 1960: Social Credit vs. Liberal vs. SDP 1964: Social Credit vs. Democratic Front vs. Workers Socialist Party 1968: Social Credit vs. Social Democratic vs. Workers Socialist Party 1972: Social Credit vs. Social Democratic vs. Communist 1976: Social Credit vs. Social Democratic vs. Communist 1980: Social Credit vs. Social Democratic vs. Communist 1985: Social Credit vs. Social Democratic vs. National Party 1990: Social Credit vs. Social Democratic vs. National Party vs. Unity Party 1995: Social Democratic vs. Alliance 2000: Social Democratic vs. Alliance vs. Green Party 2005: Social Democratic vs. Alliance vs. Green Party 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Dog Democrat Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 Looking good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treasurer Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 Nice. I'll enjoy hearing how these parties were evolved or created. Big task though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matvail2002 Posted September 25, 2009 Author Share Posted September 25, 2009 Nice. I'll enjoy hearing how these parties were evolved or created. Big task though. 1908: New Party vs Liberal vs. Socialist Labour The New Party is a coalition of anti-socialist elements. The Liberal Party is a centrist party, but is pro-free-trade. Socialist Labour is a left-wing formed mainly from some trade unions. 1916: New Party vs. Liberal vs. Socialist Some moderate members of the Socialist Labour party joins the Liberal Party and some more radical members form the Communist Party. 1920: Anti-Socialist Front vs. Socialist vs. Communist The Anti-Socialist Front is formed as a temporary alliance of the New Party and Liberal during the Red Scare. 1924: Conservative vs. Liberal vs. Socialist vs. Communist With a new leader, the New Party change its name to the Conservative Party. 1932: Coalition vs. Communist vs. National Front Due to a polarisation of some parties and especially with the formation of the fascist National Front, the Conservatives and Liberals enters in a Grand Coalition. 1945: Social Credit vs. Popular Front vs. Liberal After the war and with a new leader, many members of the Conservatives are going to the new Social Credit Party. The left is united with the Popular Front. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matvail2002 Posted September 25, 2009 Author Share Posted September 25, 2009 1955: Social Credit vs. Liberal vs. SDP The SDP is formed by moderate left-wing elements in both the Socialists and the more radical Left. 1964: Social Credit vs. Democratic Front vs. Workers Socialist Party The Democratic Front is found as a coalition between the Liberals and the SDP. The Workers Socialist Party is a Radical Marxist Party. 1985: Social Credit vs. Social Democratic vs. National Party The National Party is formed by some right-wing former members of the Social Credit. 1990: Social Credit vs. Social Democratic vs. National Party vs. Unity Party The Unity Party is formed by a few renegate Social Credit MP. 1995: Social Democratic vs. Alliance The Alliance is formed as a center-right party by the amalgamation of the Social Credit Party, National Party and Unity Party. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Dog Democrat Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 Will you make 2009, then 1908? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matvail2002 Posted September 25, 2009 Author Share Posted September 25, 2009 2009 is about 90% done. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Dog Democrat Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 Sounds good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treasurer Posted September 26, 2009 Share Posted September 26, 2009 Bit of a first i think, a 2-party system non-US scenario. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matvail2002 Posted September 26, 2009 Author Share Posted September 26, 2009 No, there are four parties in the 2009 scenario, all of them which are strong in their respective region. In fact, it is VERY diificult to have a majority for one party. Alliance SDP Party of Regions Green Party 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Dog Democrat Posted September 27, 2009 Share Posted September 27, 2009 Wait, so will Social Credit be in power for 45 years straight? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zagatstein Posted September 27, 2009 Share Posted September 27, 2009 Wait, so will Social Credit be in power for 45 years straight? It's kind of conceivable--weren't the Liberals in power in Canada for a long stretch of time in the middle of the 20th century? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Dog Democrat Posted September 27, 2009 Share Posted September 27, 2009 Actually I want that, makes it more interesting for a liberal like myself. No, the Liberals had separate twenty year reigns of Power. This would be more like Japan, with the conservative party being in power for six decades straight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matvail2002 Posted September 28, 2009 Author Share Posted September 28, 2009 It's kind of conceivable--weren't the Liberals in power in Canada for a long stretch of time in the middle of the 20th century? For the federal parliament, the Liberals were in power from long periods of time due to the lack of a strong opposition or a divided opposition. And yes, it's possible to be in power for a very long time in provincial politics in Canada: In Alberta, ALL of the governing parties were only in power during one era, only to return in the wilderness after that. Basically, Alberta is a dominant party state, so the opposition don't have many seats. 1905-1921 Alberta Liberal Party 1921-1935 United Farmers of Alberta 1935-1971 Social Credit Party of Alberta 1971-present Alberta Progressive Conservatives In British Columbia, the Social Credit Party was in power from 1952 to 1972 and from 1975 to 1991. Ironically, many of the former members of the Social Credit Party now are with the BC Liberals. In Ontario, the Progressive Conservatives were in power nonstop from 1943 to 1985. In Québec, the Liberals were in power nonstop from 1897 to 1935. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.