RFK/JFKfan Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 I'm thinking of creating a Prop 8 Scenario. The Crusadars for Yes on 8 will be people like Rick Warren, and the No on 8 Crusadars will be people like Nancy Pelosi and Gavin Newsom. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patine Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 I'm thinking of creating a Prop 8 Scenario. The Crusadars for Yes on 8 will be people like Rick Warren, and the No on 8 Crusadars will be people like Nancy Pelosi and Gavin Newsom. Problem is, how do you divide one singular issue into the needed 18? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkmoon72 Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 Problem is, how do you divide one singular issue into the needed 18? You could set "Prop 8" as the issue for all 18 issues, keeping the platform the same for each one. Would that work? My question is, how would candidates work? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 Or you could focus on the individual aspects of the debate. That would make it a deeper and more meaningful scenario, in my opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkmoon72 Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 Or you could focus on the individual aspects of the debate. That would make it a deeper and more meaningful scenario, in my opinion. That's true. I suppose candidates could be done by assigning the most prominent Californians for and against Prop 8. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matvail2002 Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Or you could focus on the individual aspects of the debate. That would make it a deeper and more meaningful scenario, in my opinion. Maybe: -Right to adopt -Civil union Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Maybe:-Right to adopt -Civil union Yeah, things like that. -Legality (whether an amendment could change it or a revision was needed) -Family Effects -Religious Effects -Historical Parallels (is it a noble crusade for the family, or comparable to the backlash against interracial marriage?) Also, I would just have the candidates as "Yes" and "No". Set the figures up as Crusaders. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.