SaskGuy 16 Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 I have several scenarios that are ready to review and be critiqued. Saskatchewan - 1944 Saskatchewan - 1982 Weyburn - Big Muddy - 2006 These 3 have been sent to a few people who requested 1944, so check your inboxes. Also up for grabs: Manitoba - 2003 Ontario - 2003 These are my versions of scenarios already posted, with new graphics and parties. Link to post Share on other sites
Patine 285 Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 Please send me the new Manitoba and Ontairio ones! Same e-mail address as you sent Saskatchewan 1944 to. Link to post Share on other sites
graemp 9 Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 I'm not sure that the significance of Manitoba 2003 warrants much attention, but like Saskguy, I played around with the original scenario as I was dissatisfied with some aspects. In my version I have; 1) a new map which breaks Winnipeg up 2) accurate party campaign funds 3) re-defined candidate bonuses which reflected where parties targeted I never got around to completing the ridings file re-do because I got distracted into more interesting Manitoba scenarios. As for Ontario 2003 (and 1999), that one didn't quite work for me either. Someoene else did a 2007 which was perhaps a bit better. Ontario seems to have a lot of scenario potential but I think it needs one good template to emerge first. Link to post Share on other sites
Treasurer 28 Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 Send me all 5 of them please. treasurerofthepc at yahoo.com Link to post Share on other sites
mz452 18 Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 All five please! I have waited for years for this by-election Matty1019@yahoo.com Link to post Share on other sites
james_bond72 5 Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 I want to try it! james_bond72@hotmail.com Thanks! Link to post Share on other sites
matvail2002 803 Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 Your Ontario map is really good! However, I would change the name of some regions and maybe divide the Hamilton and Niagara regions and maybe divide Northern Ontario between Northwestern and Northeastern Ontario. Also change, Ottawa-Nepean to Ottawa-Carleton and change Hamilton-Niagara Falls to Hamilton-Niagara. Maybe add 905 to Central Ontario. For the flags: Toronto--Toronto flag (okay) Mississauga--Mississauga flag Hamilton-Niagara--Hamilton city flag Mid-Western Ontario--Kitchener flag Southern Ontario--London flag Central Ontario--York Region flag Eastern Ontario--Kingston flag Ottawa-Nepean--Ottawa flag Northern Ontario--Maybe Sudbury (Northeastern) or Thunder Bay flag (Northwestern) Link to post Share on other sites
Kauai 0 Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 All of them please! ^^ Kandafoote@aol.com Link to post Share on other sites
matvail2002 803 Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 Canada - 2050 - 20%Untitled Country election - 15% Have you found any of these that you have begun? Link to post Share on other sites
SaskGuy 16 Posted February 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 2050 is only in planning stages. There are a few new regions and different parties are more powerful. The untitled country pretty much has a map - no region names, candidate names, or opening percentages. So they need some work. Link to post Share on other sites
matvail2002 803 Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 Do you have any ideas at that time about Canada 2050 about the standings for parties? Link to post Share on other sites
matvail2002 803 Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 As per the Saskatchewan provincial election in 2003 and 2007 where are the main bases of strengths for each party? Is it basically? NDP: Regina, Saskatoon and the north Sask Party: Rural areas and some suburbs Not sure however about Liberals Link to post Share on other sites
SaskGuy 16 Posted February 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 As per the Saskatchewan provincial election in 2003 and 2007 where are the main bases of strengths for each party?Is it basically? NDP: Regina, Saskatoon and the north Sask Party: Rural areas and some suburbs Not sure however about Liberals That's essentially it. Liberals...maybe Saskatoon...but not really. 2050 has 400+ ridings, with the Liberals and BQ in serious recession. Or something like that. It's been a while. Link to post Share on other sites
SaskGuy 16 Posted February 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 Your Ontario map is really good! However, I would change the name of some regions and maybe divide the Hamilton and Niagara regions and maybe divide Northern Ontario between Northwestern and Northeastern Ontario. I'll see about re-dividing the regions. I made it when I was less aware of the 'regions' of Ontario, and simply focused on making even amounts of ridings per area. Link to post Share on other sites
RI Democrat 9 Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 I have several scenarios that are ready to review and be critiqued.Saskatchewan - 1944 Saskatchewan - 1982 Weyburn - Big Muddy - 2006 These 3 have been sent to a few people who requested 1944, so check your inboxes. Also up for grabs: Manitoba - 2003 Ontario - 2003 These are my versions of scenarios already posted, with new graphics and parties. Please send them to scoyleri@yahoo.com. Link to post Share on other sites
Treasurer 28 Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 It was good to see a Canadian by-election, but playing as the NDP, it was way too easy, and this was on hard. I ended up with 49 seats and the Saskatchewan party with 2 seats. Good map though. There was nothing wrong with the finances, just the ads were too plenty and cheap! However, i really enjoyed the Ontario 2003 Update. A really good map, and although i failed to pass the goal for the PC's, i was getting something out of it. Plenty of money left though, by the end of the campaign Link to post Share on other sites
SaskGuy 16 Posted February 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 It was good to see a Canadian by-election, but playing as the NDP, it was way too easy, and this was on hard. I ended up with 49 seats and the Saskatchewan party with 2 seats. Good map though. There was nothing wrong with the finances, just the ads were too plenty and cheap! By-elections are tricky. The game engine is not really designed for it. The ads have always given me trouble. However, i really enjoyed the Ontario 2003 Update. A really good map, and although i failed to pass the goal for the PC's, i was getting something out of it. Plenty of money left though, by the end of the campaign I haven't touched Ontario in such a long time...I'll have to go through it and adjust as needed. Link to post Share on other sites
Norman 1 Posted February 28, 2009 Report Share Posted February 28, 2009 I'll take Ontario for sure, wnorman@connect.carleton.ca Link to post Share on other sites
RI Democrat 9 Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 Just tried Saskatchewan 1944 and thought it was good. The events largely seemed to move the electorate towards the left (not necessarily a complaint, as I don't really know the history, just an observation). A couple small points about the party goals: the CCF's goal is 45% of the vote and 47 seats. I played as Douglas and won 51% of the vote and 41 seats. Maybe I made some strategic errors in where I concentrated my resources, but is it possible that 47 seats is not a realistic goal? Also, one of the smaller parties (Labour Progressive, I think) has its goal as 1% and 0 seats, but the party leader's description says that his goal is to win a seat. Link to post Share on other sites
graemp 9 Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 A couple small points about the party goals: the CCF's goal is 45% of the vote and 47 seats. I played as Douglas and won 51% of the vote and 41 seats. Maybe I made some strategic errors in where I concentrated my resources, but is it possible that 47 seats is not a realistic goal?Also, one of the smaller parties (Labour Progressive, I think) has its goal as 1% and 0 seats, but the party leader's description says that his goal is to win a seat. In my view, the CCF goal should be 53% and 47 seats as this is what they actually achieved. I look forward to playing this scenario when it is finished. Link to post Share on other sites
Hogan37 2 Posted April 17, 2011 Report Share Posted April 17, 2011 I may be a couple years too late but I would love all 5 of these scenarios. catlin.hogan@gmail.com Link to post Share on other sites
LordBeckett 29 Posted September 21, 2011 Report Share Posted September 21, 2011 Can you please send me them padams0511@gmail.com Link to post Share on other sites
LordBeckett 29 Posted September 22, 2011 Report Share Posted September 22, 2011 Could you please send me them at:padams0511@gmail.com Link to post Share on other sites
appelb 2 Posted October 8, 2011 Report Share Posted October 8, 2011 If you're still around (2 yrs later), I'd love these scenarios: brian.appel@gmail.com Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.