SaskGuy Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 I have several scenarios that are ready to review and be critiqued. Saskatchewan - 1944 Saskatchewan - 1982 Weyburn - Big Muddy - 2006 These 3 have been sent to a few people who requested 1944, so check your inboxes. Also up for grabs: Manitoba - 2003 Ontario - 2003 These are my versions of scenarios already posted, with new graphics and parties. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patine Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 Please send me the new Manitoba and Ontairio ones! Same e-mail address as you sent Saskatchewan 1944 to. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
graemp Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 I'm not sure that the significance of Manitoba 2003 warrants much attention, but like Saskguy, I played around with the original scenario as I was dissatisfied with some aspects. In my version I have; 1) a new map which breaks Winnipeg up 2) accurate party campaign funds 3) re-defined candidate bonuses which reflected where parties targeted I never got around to completing the ridings file re-do because I got distracted into more interesting Manitoba scenarios. As for Ontario 2003 (and 1999), that one didn't quite work for me either. Someoene else did a 2007 which was perhaps a bit better. Ontario seems to have a lot of scenario potential but I think it needs one good template to emerge first. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treasurer Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 Send me all 5 of them please. treasurerofthepc at yahoo.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mz452 Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 All five please! I have waited for years for this by-election Matty1019@yahoo.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_bond72 Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 I want to try it! james_bond72@hotmail.com Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matvail2002 Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 Your Ontario map is really good! However, I would change the name of some regions and maybe divide the Hamilton and Niagara regions and maybe divide Northern Ontario between Northwestern and Northeastern Ontario. Also change, Ottawa-Nepean to Ottawa-Carleton and change Hamilton-Niagara Falls to Hamilton-Niagara. Maybe add 905 to Central Ontario. For the flags: Toronto--Toronto flag (okay) Mississauga--Mississauga flag Hamilton-Niagara--Hamilton city flag Mid-Western Ontario--Kitchener flag Southern Ontario--London flag Central Ontario--York Region flag Eastern Ontario--Kingston flag Ottawa-Nepean--Ottawa flag Northern Ontario--Maybe Sudbury (Northeastern) or Thunder Bay flag (Northwestern) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kauai Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 All of them please! ^^ Kandafoote@aol.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matvail2002 Posted February 19, 2009 Share Posted February 19, 2009 Canada - 2050 - 20%Untitled Country election - 15% Have you found any of these that you have begun? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaskGuy Posted February 20, 2009 Author Share Posted February 20, 2009 2050 is only in planning stages. There are a few new regions and different parties are more powerful. The untitled country pretty much has a map - no region names, candidate names, or opening percentages. So they need some work. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matvail2002 Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 Do you have any ideas at that time about Canada 2050 about the standings for parties? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matvail2002 Posted February 20, 2009 Share Posted February 20, 2009 As per the Saskatchewan provincial election in 2003 and 2007 where are the main bases of strengths for each party? Is it basically? NDP: Regina, Saskatoon and the north Sask Party: Rural areas and some suburbs Not sure however about Liberals 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaskGuy Posted February 20, 2009 Author Share Posted February 20, 2009 As per the Saskatchewan provincial election in 2003 and 2007 where are the main bases of strengths for each party?Is it basically? NDP: Regina, Saskatoon and the north Sask Party: Rural areas and some suburbs Not sure however about Liberals That's essentially it. Liberals...maybe Saskatoon...but not really. 2050 has 400+ ridings, with the Liberals and BQ in serious recession. Or something like that. It's been a while. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaskGuy Posted February 20, 2009 Author Share Posted February 20, 2009 Your Ontario map is really good! However, I would change the name of some regions and maybe divide the Hamilton and Niagara regions and maybe divide Northern Ontario between Northwestern and Northeastern Ontario. I'll see about re-dividing the regions. I made it when I was less aware of the 'regions' of Ontario, and simply focused on making even amounts of ridings per area. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RI Democrat Posted February 21, 2009 Share Posted February 21, 2009 I have several scenarios that are ready to review and be critiqued.Saskatchewan - 1944 Saskatchewan - 1982 Weyburn - Big Muddy - 2006 These 3 have been sent to a few people who requested 1944, so check your inboxes. Also up for grabs: Manitoba - 2003 Ontario - 2003 These are my versions of scenarios already posted, with new graphics and parties. Please send them to scoyleri@yahoo.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treasurer Posted February 23, 2009 Share Posted February 23, 2009 It was good to see a Canadian by-election, but playing as the NDP, it was way too easy, and this was on hard. I ended up with 49 seats and the Saskatchewan party with 2 seats. Good map though. There was nothing wrong with the finances, just the ads were too plenty and cheap! However, i really enjoyed the Ontario 2003 Update. A really good map, and although i failed to pass the goal for the PC's, i was getting something out of it. Plenty of money left though, by the end of the campaign 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaskGuy Posted February 23, 2009 Author Share Posted February 23, 2009 It was good to see a Canadian by-election, but playing as the NDP, it was way too easy, and this was on hard. I ended up with 49 seats and the Saskatchewan party with 2 seats. Good map though. There was nothing wrong with the finances, just the ads were too plenty and cheap! By-elections are tricky. The game engine is not really designed for it. The ads have always given me trouble. However, i really enjoyed the Ontario 2003 Update. A really good map, and although i failed to pass the goal for the PC's, i was getting something out of it. Plenty of money left though, by the end of the campaign I haven't touched Ontario in such a long time...I'll have to go through it and adjust as needed. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norman Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 I'll take Ontario for sure, wnorman@connect.carleton.ca Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RI Democrat Posted March 1, 2009 Share Posted March 1, 2009 Just tried Saskatchewan 1944 and thought it was good. The events largely seemed to move the electorate towards the left (not necessarily a complaint, as I don't really know the history, just an observation). A couple small points about the party goals: the CCF's goal is 45% of the vote and 47 seats. I played as Douglas and won 51% of the vote and 41 seats. Maybe I made some strategic errors in where I concentrated my resources, but is it possible that 47 seats is not a realistic goal? Also, one of the smaller parties (Labour Progressive, I think) has its goal as 1% and 0 seats, but the party leader's description says that his goal is to win a seat. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
graemp Posted March 1, 2009 Share Posted March 1, 2009 A couple small points about the party goals: the CCF's goal is 45% of the vote and 47 seats. I played as Douglas and won 51% of the vote and 41 seats. Maybe I made some strategic errors in where I concentrated my resources, but is it possible that 47 seats is not a realistic goal?Also, one of the smaller parties (Labour Progressive, I think) has its goal as 1% and 0 seats, but the party leader's description says that his goal is to win a seat. In my view, the CCF goal should be 53% and 47 seats as this is what they actually achieved. I look forward to playing this scenario when it is finished. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hogan37 Posted April 17, 2011 Share Posted April 17, 2011 I may be a couple years too late but I would love all 5 of these scenarios. catlin.hogan@gmail.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordBeckett Posted September 21, 2011 Share Posted September 21, 2011 Can you please send me them padams0511@gmail.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordBeckett Posted September 22, 2011 Share Posted September 22, 2011 Could you please send me them at:padams0511@gmail.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
appelb Posted October 8, 2011 Share Posted October 8, 2011 If you're still around (2 yrs later), I'd love these scenarios: brian.appel@gmail.com 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.