Thunder

I felt Leadership also had the concept of "devotion from your party", which bumped the score up significantly.

I did not know that. Sorry. All I heard was that in a comment somewhere it said he had a good scenario, and I saw in a few playthroughs. Thank you, however.

The expanded 2016 election scenario.

Can anyone find Jonathan Kudkela's scenario? It appears to have disappeared. A defunct link is below. http://campaigns.270soft.com/2016/11/25/2016-general-election-daily-poll-updates/

Assuming "most preferred for me": 1. Warren 2. Sanders 3. Clinton 4. Harris 5. Booker 6. Biden 7. Gillibrand 8. Castro 9. Avenatti 10. Trump

OK, thank you.

@Hestia11 Since I'm considering creating a character, what are the differences from OTL in this timeline (and what positions had the Overton Window been shifted around on)? You seem experienced so I might ask you. If it's too much to summarize it's OK.

Placed in brackets above. Mostly guesses, you can check ideology charts here.

I get 997-999 voters in each region.

Uh, yes. http://campaigns.270soft.com/p4e4/ @Derran Click the download link in the third paragraph.

I'll note https://www.270towin.com/maps/0NRE9 is likely a more realistic tie map, to be honest. Also agreed, although alternate voting methods likely have more promise for multiparty systems.

I reset all the percentages, but nothing happened. If it helps, I'm spectating with Bloomberg.

Here was where each state stopped updating in a rerun of the scenario.

Version 2.8.2.