
Thunder
Members-
Content Count
74 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Community Reputation
0 NeutralAbout Thunder
-
Rank
Political Monster
Recent Profile Visitors
109 profile views
-
I felt Leadership also had the concept of "devotion from your party", which bumped the score up significantly.
-
I did not know that. Sorry. All I heard was that in a comment somewhere it said he had a good scenario, and I saw in a few playthroughs. Thank you, however.
-
The expanded 2016 election scenario.
-
Can anyone find Jonathan Kudkela's scenario? It appears to have disappeared. A defunct link is below. http://campaigns.270soft.com/2016/11/25/2016-general-election-daily-poll-updates/
-
Assuming "most preferred for me": 1. Warren 2. Sanders 3. Clinton 4. Harris 5. Booker 6. Biden 7. Gillibrand 8. Castro 9. Avenatti 10. Trump
-
OK, thank you.
-
@Hestia11 Since I'm considering creating a character, what are the differences from OTL in this timeline (and what positions had the Overton Window been shifted around on)? You seem experienced so I might ask you. If it's too much to summarize it's OK.
-
Placed in brackets above. Mostly guesses, you can check ideology charts here.
-
I get 997-999 voters in each region.
-
Is this game still available?
Thunder replied to Derran's topic in President Forever (Original, 2004 Version)
Uh, yes. http://campaigns.270soft.com/p4e4/ @Derran Click the download link in the third paragraph. -
the USA should implement a 539th electoral vote.
Thunder replied to NYConservative's topic in General
I'll note https://www.270towin.com/maps/0NRE9 is likely a more realistic tie map, to be honest. Also agreed, although alternate voting methods likely have more promise for multiparty systems. -
I reset all the percentages, but nothing happened. If it helps, I'm spectating with Bloomberg.
-
Here was where each state stopped updating in a rerun of the scenario.
-
Version 2.8.2.