Jump to content
270soft Forum


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by bruhgmger2

  1. Oh you meant in the spin section I though you meant near the area where you can bring up the menu. Thanks!
  2. I don't see any numbers in the top left. Or anywhere to access the interviews for that matter. I'm using Pi version 2.4.9. Is the reason I can't access the interviews the version I'm using?
  3. Seriously what the hell. I can have 2-3 rallies in swing states, release a highly successful attack ad against Nixon, have 3 surrogates with barnstorming bonuses barnstorming, have Muskie hold rallies, give a policy speech attacking Richard Nixon and it won't make a damn difference, Nixon will have one "Nixon shines on Late Night with Johnny Carson event" or "Nixon leaves good impression on Late Night with Johnny Carson" and go from +3 momentum to +10 momentum (and where does he get these interviews from anyway, and how do I get them? Because I have not had one "Humphrey leaves good impression
  4. On the 1936 election scenario by vcczar when i try playing as the share our wealth party no VP candidate shows up in the VP slot, as in there is no VP. Any idea on how to fix this?
  5. Now that you mention it, a North Korea election scenario would actually be pretty interesting (with the election not being rigged of course, but with Kim Jong Un's party starting massive ahead).
  6. And I would disagree with 1984 being classed as uninteresting sure it ended up being lopsided, but it ended 2 decades of Liberal rule and was a major realigning election, and I thought it would be interesting to see if you could stop the landslide or even win, it's the same reason I like playing a Hoover in 1932, Landon in 1936 or the Liberals in 2006.
  7. You think so? As a fellow Canadian, I wouldn't agree. For example, I don't find 1911, 1930, 1935, 1940, 1965, or 1974 interesting. I will grant you that 1873, 1921, 1926, 1957, 1963, 1993 and 1980 were very interesting.
  8. The issue with Canadian elections is, almost all of them are boring.
  9. Currently trying to make a Canada 1984 scenario, but I can't seem to quite get a hang of how to make scenarios
  10. How Many ads we talking about being run at once?
  11. 1896 1932/1936, and 1968 1896 because I like trying to win as Bryan 1932/1936 because I like playing as the Republican and winning (which is actually a lot easier then you might think) 1968 because I like all the possibilities and interesting match-ups that can result (like Rockefeller/ Reagan vs Johnson/Kennedy or Romney/Rockefeller vs Kennedy/Sanford)
  12. Has anyone ever won in the Primaries as RFK? I've tried a few times and I hit a wall at about 2200-2300 delegates (you need 2713 to win a majority of the delegates), and since Humphrey/Johnson has the support of the favourite sons and McCarthy really dislikes Kennedy and will throw never throw his support behind him Humphrey/Johnson always win. So does anyone here have an idea of how to win as RFK in the primaries?
  13. I'm just curious as to whether or not anyone has ever had an election gone to the house while playing PI? If so who did the house pick?
  14. I don't know if it's do-able, but could you make a scenario from when the elections were between the Liberals and the Conservatives?
  15. I was creating a 1984 scenario and was in the middle of editing the issues in order to make them fit the 1984 election. So after editing the issues, I clicked save at the editor when a pop appeared, and it said this "Access Violation at address 004D9698 in module "PMI_Canada.exe". Read of address 00000018. I think it is worth mentioning this was my attempt at making a scenario.
  • Create New...