Jump to content
270soft Forum

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/23/2012 in all areas

  1. Sounds good. I'm looking forward to it. Definitely one of the most interesting elections in history.
    1 point
  2. I like the idea of this scenario. Any more progress? Anywhere I can help?
    1 point
  3. Good idea I'll look for one to swap with that.
    1 point
  4. I would like help if your willing to give it . I've been working on it but the last 11 days I was in DC on vacation so there was a gap in my working.
    1 point
  5. Yes Oklahoma and New Mexico will receive electoral votes. As for the rest they remain in the USA.
    1 point
  6. Well I got a new computer so if they did its gone forever (which would really piss me off )
    1 point
  7. I am so sorry I completly forgot about this. I'll get back on it starting now.
    1 point
  8. (Sorry, as this is an old thread) I am very interested on working on a remake of the Alaska 2006 Election. Do you have any idea how the mentionned scenario was constructed?
    1 point
  9. Her convention speech was better then anyone that Obama could have given but she seems to be repeating it over and over.
    1 point
  10. I must agree with you here Obama is a better speaker. Hes more persuasive.
    1 point
  11. Popularity doesn't define charisma. I see it as your ability to communicate and connect with voters and her along with Obama are great with that.
    1 point
  12. As long as Obamas exp is 2 aswell I wouldn't object to that.
    1 point
  13. Perheaps leadership and readiness should be seperate.
    1 point
  14. I would put both Pallin and Obama at 2...both are, in my mind, very similar in that category. The only tipper for me would be that Obama had to win a Senate race in Illinois over a governorship in a fairly small state, but that's offset by the fact his opponent was a joke. I know with my Canadian scenarios, I generally go: 1-Inexperience is a crippling issue. 2-Inexperience is an issue, some legislative/financial experience. 3-High ranking Cabinet post provincially/Federally, involvement with policy; Or presumed to be ready by media/populace. 4-Short-term incumbent; High ranking inner Ca
    1 point
  15. No offense but why? This is a forum for an election sim. Political chatter shouldn't be a problem.
    1 point
  16. No its not just. I've always been a proponent of the flat tax.
    1 point
  17. I don't know why we can't talk politics on a forum for a political simulation game.
    1 point
  18. So a man works hard and makes a confortable living and he should be punished for it? CHOO CHOO all aboard the socialism train.
    1 point
  19. Wait till the gaffe machine starts revving up agian..
    1 point
  20. Bidens pretty much official now. Atta be stupid dems leaking it in the middle of the night.
    1 point
  21. A new poll has Huckabee as Mccains most favorable VEEP Lieberman 2nd and Romney third. Mccain has to see that and should have huck in the second tier.
    1 point
  22. Still copying off EM. I seriously doubt you would have come up with a list half that size on your own.
    1 point
  23. Mised that. I think he should be top tier. But it seems Mr. 9 has made no new additions.
    1 point
  24. I think its pretty safe to take Hagel off the GOP veep list. Maybe add him on the demo veep list.
    1 point
  25. This release is making my mouth water. You've outdone yourselves again.
    1 point
  26. Huckabees been topping alot of Mccain VEEP lists. How bout him.
    1 point
  27. Well when its Ronald Reagan the great hero of the 20th century any mention of him in a campaign would have an impact.
    1 point
  28. Hey did Dutch endorse anyone in this election. If he did did he campaign for them I mean his alzhiemers must have been escalating. He woul be a very powerful but expensive crusader as he was in the '92 scenario.
    1 point
  29. Do atleast the Libertarians. They're a good space bar party. THey take votes form both sides.
    1 point
  30. Since there are two new scenarios that unrealistically favor the democrats why don't we make a scenario that unrealistically favors the GOP. Here it is: During the Carter years the 22nd amendment is repealed. In 1980 Ronald Reagan is elected bring in one of the greatest era in the countries history. Originally deciding not to run in 1988 under pressure from the base rus again and again. He is president until 2006 at 95 when he dies leaving his new VEEP George W. Bush as prseident for two years. The country has thrived for the past 28 years and the Reagan era is over. The GOP dominates congres
    1 point
  31. Is it possible Newt would be Majority whip.
    1 point
  32. Any Idea on Reagans/Bushs cabinet at this time?
    1 point
  33. Sceario has been started. Any suggestion on canditaes (who rises to prominence who doesn't) and the status of th congress and such would be greatly appreciated. And platforms aswell. And crusaders.
    1 point
  34. Just to let everyone know I'm starting this on the weekend. I'm using the current US scenario as a base with issues changed around a little. For example Roe V Wade is overturned and Abortion is banned so the description for the left would have to be changed a little. I may make the issue centers a little more conservative.
    1 point
  35. Who might be the current congressional leaders in this setting?
    1 point
  36. Since the GOP probably gained back congress between '88 and '92 who do you think wold be speaker at this time.
    1 point
  37. I think Mccain would be a good candiate too. Since they'res no 9/11 Rudy doesn't rise to fame. Maybe Huckabee he would still probably be governor. Pataki? Frist? Thompson? Also I'll cut one of the issues and make term limits one.
    1 point
  38. Well I kind of agree there and it will be competitive. California will probably be in the red colum or a least leaning red since their boy was there for 26 years. The economy is still thriving though Bush hasn't helped. Its gonna be close but some swing states will be solid GOP.
    1 point
  39. Its not anymore unrealistic than Al Gore winning in Texas in 2004.
    1 point
  40. I think that might be the most unrealistic part: The LBJ->Nixon->Ford->Carter superfecta spurring America to get rid of Executive term limits. A mulligan amendment might have been more likely.
    1 point
  41. Canditates may be hard because some candiates who may seem likely may not have gained notice in a 26 year Reagan regime. Maybe Clinton for the demos?
    1 point
  42. I hope so. Just like I was when I wrote ALWAYS. Just like I know HabsFan was be sarcastic when he said Belinda Stronach was not a Social Democrat.
    1 point
  43. 1 point
  44. A copy will be very much appreciated! matvail2002 @ gmail.com
    1 point
  45. 1 point
  46. I agree; Johnson in the Southern Dems is a mistake. I'll edit that, and I've mentioned it in an e-mail to heat.
    -1 points
×
×
  • Create New...