Jump to content
270soft Forum
Sign in to follow this  
admin_270

U.N. - 2003

Rate this Scenario  

10 members have voted

  1. 1. Rate this Scenario

    • 5/5 - Excellent
      4
    • 4/5 - Very Good
      0
    • 3/5 - Good
      2
    • 2/5 - Okay
      0
    • 1/5 - Poor
      4


Recommended Posts

A new scenario is now up:

"U.N." - 2003, by Alex

You can go to the President Forever Updates/Scenarios page to download this scenario.

Please note: this is a third-party scenario - 80soft did not make this scenario.

The 80soft.com Team

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Played it, and I'm dissapointed. The list of issues is...bad, and..well..pretty much the entire scenario did not interests me.

Sorry. But you can always do better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Did not worked for me (a message appeared about floating points). :unsure:

What options did you use and who did you try to play as? I'll see if I can recreate the problem...

Played it, and I'm dissapointed. The list of issues is...bad, and..well..pretty much the entire scenario did not interests me.

Sorry. But you can always do better.

Sorry, can't please everyone I guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You only say that because President Bush can't win I tried but it doesn't work out like real life where we got to invade Iraq so it's a really bad scenario it needs to be more realism.

The US never got UN approval for the invasion, so it's quite realistic when you can't win as Bush.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You are a stupid hick if you think that because we went to war with Iraq so we did get U.N. approval and I think that you ought to get your facts straight. :rolleyes:

Good luck finding the subject and predicate in that grammatical mess. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

edited stuff has to be approved by the wikipedia staff. so if the changes weren't true, they couldn't be posted. however, he probably didn't even change it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You only say that because President Bush can't win I tried but it doesn't work out like real life where we got to invade Iraq so it's a really bad scenario it needs to be more realism.

Well, in real life, a resolution to invade Iraq had not passed the Security Council so the Coalition invade unilaterally, which is the most likely situation to come of the scenario: the "Indecision" party wins and the Security council takes no action in regards to it. It is possible to win as Bush if you can take France, Russia, and China, and not lose US or UK, and the same is true for Chirac in the vice versa situation. The scenario is to decide whether the UN takes action regarding Iraq: the choice was between immediate invasion or continued inspections. The UN made no decision in real life, sorry if you don't like the truth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...