Jump to content
270soft Forum
lizphairphreak

Exploratory Committees

Recommended Posts

An article from Vox came out that goes into detail about exploratory committees, which was helpful for me (even though I felt I vaguely knew before): https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/1/4/18165576/elizabeth-warren-exploratory-committee-2020-presidential-campaign

with all this in mind, I’m wondering if expanding the functions a candidate can use in the game while technically just “exploring” would be better. I like the mechanic of Not Seeking to Undecided to Official though the game is so restricted in the aundecided phase that I’m not sure you’re as able to accomplish what a real life candidate would do while “exploring.”

Thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, lizphairphreak said:

An article from Vox came out that goes into detail about exploratory committees, which was helpful for me (even though I felt I vaguely knew before): https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/1/4/18165576/elizabeth-warren-exploratory-committee-2020-presidential-campaign

with all this in mind, I’m wondering if expanding the functions a candidate can use in the game while technically just “exploring” would be better. I like the mechanic of Not Seeking to Undecided to Official though the game is so restricted in the aundecided phase that I’m not sure you’re as able to accomplish what a real life candidate would do while “exploring.”

Thoughts?

How long have these committees been in use in American politics? I mean, in many older, historical scenarios, it was much more likely a "Not Seeking" candidate would instead be nominated, or "drafted," as the term went, as a "dark horse" or "compromise" candidate (like Polk or Garfield, or even Wilson, really) than start such a committee. I think a mechanic to toggle on or off a "modern" or "historical" view of what a "Not Seeking" candidate would mean and how they would become relevant would be useful, too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, Patine said:

How long have these committees been in use in American politics? I mean, in many older, historical scenarios, it was much more likely a "Not Seeking" candidate would instead be nominated, or "drafted," as the term went, as a "dark horse" or "compromise" candidate (like Polk or Garfield, or even Wilson, really) than start such a committee. I think a mechanic to toggle on or off a "modern" or "historical" view of what a "Not Seeking" candidate would mean and how they would become relevant would be useful, too.

I like that idea a lot, though maybe not force to choose between historical and modern (so that we could see a “compromise” candidate for a modern election too)... I was actually thinking about that the other day. What if you played as Not Seeking and used media to boost your relations with all the other candidates and then declared for the last couple of primaries, so you could go into the convention and potentially be able to take delegates because of your positive relations?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...