Jump to content
270soft Forum
vcczar

New Historical President RP

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Reagan04 said:

(Talk about a party in disarray, literally founded by an insane person.)

OOC: Perhaps the other parties should get together and make an amendment on multipartisan (which would be the proper for such cooperation if a multiparty system had emerged pretty much from the start - I notice the word "bipartisan" still used for that purpose at several points in this thread for that form of cooperation, which wouldn't have logically emerged as the parlance term if a multiparty system had been in place the whole - pedantic note there) to bar someone whose seriously mentally ill from high office. In fact, I sincerely believe such a bar from offices like the U.S. Presidency should exist in RL, despite many defending the Constitutional right of someone to hold such an office without being disqualified, or even potentially receiving a psychiatric analysis, because of the lack of such a disqualifier in the original Constitution, written in a day that predated even Freud by over a half-of-a-century and where their only understanding of mental illness came down to "eccentric," "touched," "possessed," "senile," and, "raving lunatic," and they certainly couldn't treat it or have tests to know it was in the onset. Plus, having personally dealt with mentally ill people, and considering known obviously mentally leaders in other countries of recent years - Niyazov, Gaddaffi, Mputo, and the Kim Family, I have no idea whatsoever why anyone would even remotely defend having such a person potentially become U.S. President, and even have right to be protected from psychiatric testing if their mental health was feared for legitimately.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Reagan04 said:

(Talk about a party in disarray, literally founded by an insane person.)

Mhm, but it will comeback, trust me.

 

5 hours ago, Hestia11 said:

Is he going make a new one? Or what?

New one, after the election, to lead the party in a better, more libertarian manner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Kingthero Is a return on the horizon? No rush!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1948 Election

Welcome to the election of 1948! This election, we see a new Libertarian split off --- that doesn't seem to interest many libertarians. We see Wallace rejoin the ring, but without as much support as he had before. We see the Liberal President not run for re-election, and we see the former Conservative Vice President run for President.

 

Primaries

There were so significant primaries.

 

General Election Round 1

 

Langford/Francis (Lib) 357 EV 43% PV [All States but the ones below.]

Trebuano/Cruz (Con) 197 EV 42% PV [ME, RI, IL, WI, MI, CA, OR, WA, NM, OK, LA, AR, MO, KY, SC, NV, ID, NJ]

Wallace/Thomas (Soc) 11 EV 13% PV [VT, UT, SD]

Woodburrow/Curtis (Libt) 0 EV 2% PV

 

Note: Conservatives are regaining lost dominance in the West, but the Liberals managed to win, likely due to people not seeing a big need for change.

 

 

Region Breakdown (Pop Vote)

 

New England (ME, NH, VT, MA, RI, CT) : Lean Liberal | Region Hot 3 Issues: Shipping, Trade, War

Industrial Centers (NY, PA, OH, IL) : Lean Liberal | Region Hot 3 Issues: War, Trade, Economy

Industrial Midwest (WI, MI, IN) : Liberal | Region Hot 3 Issues: War, Trade, Economy

West Coast (CA, OR, WA) : Lean Conservative | Region Hot 3 Issues: War, Immigration, Morality

Southwest (AZ, NM, OK, TX) : Lean Liberal | Region Hot 3 Issues: War, Immigration, Morality

Southern Outskirts (LA, AR, MO, KY, WV, MD) : Lean Liberal | Region Hot 3 Issues: War, Morality, Economy

Deep South (MS, AL, GA) : Greatly Liberal | Region Hot 3 Issues: Economy, War, Labor

Upper South (SC, NC, VA, TN) : Lean Liberal | Region Hot 3 Issues: War, Economy, Trade

West (NV, ID, MT, WY, UT, CO, ND, SD, NE, KS) : Lean Socialist | Region Hot 3 Issues: Immigration, Environment, War

Non-Continentals (HI, CU, PR, AK) : Liberal | Region Hot 3 Issues: War, Trade, Government Efficiency

Swing States (MN, IA, NJ, DE, FL) : Lean Liberal | Region Hot 3 Issues: War, Economy, Morality

 

Congress

Liberals 52/104 Senate 42% US Rep

Conservatives 50/104 Senate 46% US Rep

Socialists 2/104 Senate 12% US Rep

RP Note: Conservatives begin to regain seats in the Senate, while a surprise Socialist hold on their House seats and a small set of wins by the Liberals led them to knock out the Conservative majority.

 

@Hestia11 events tomorrow or the day after.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pres.-Elect Langford celebrates the electoral victory and promises a new era of American prosperity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Kingthero said:

1948 Election

Welcome to the election of 1948! This election, we see a new Libertarian split off --- that doesn't seem to interest many libertarians. We see Wallace rejoin the ring, but without as much support as he had before. We see the Liberal President not run for re-election, and we see the former Conservative Vice President run for President.

 

Primaries

There were so significant primaries.

 

General Election Round 1

 

Langford/Francis (Lib) 357 EV 43% PV [All States but the ones below.]

Trebuano/Cruz (Con) 197 EV 42% PV [ME, RI, IL, WI, MI, CA, OR, WA, NM, OK, LA, AR, MO, KY, SC, NV, ID, NJ]

Wallace/Thomas (Soc) 11 EV 13% PV [VT, UT, SD]

Woodburrow/Curtis (Libt) 0 EV 2% PV

 

Note: Conservatives are regaining lost dominance in the West, but the Liberals managed to win, likely due to people not seeing a big need for change.

 

 

Region Breakdown (Pop Vote)

 

New England (ME, NH, VT, MA, RI, CT) : Lean Liberal | Region Hot 3 Issues: Shipping, Trade, War

Industrial Centers (NY, PA, OH, IL) : Lean Liberal | Region Hot 3 Issues: War, Trade, Economy

Industrial Midwest (WI, MI, IN) : Liberal | Region Hot 3 Issues: War, Trade, Economy

West Coast (CA, OR, WA) : Lean Conservative | Region Hot 3 Issues: War, Immigration, Morality

Southwest (AZ, NM, OK, TX) : Lean Liberal | Region Hot 3 Issues: War, Immigration, Morality

Southern Outskirts (LA, AR, MO, KY, WV, MD) : Lean Liberal | Region Hot 3 Issues: War, Morality, Economy

Deep South (MS, AL, GA) : Greatly Liberal | Region Hot 3 Issues: Economy, War, Labor

Upper South (SC, NC, VA, TN) : Lean Liberal | Region Hot 3 Issues: War, Economy, Trade

West (NV, ID, MT, WY, UT, CO, ND, SD, NE, KS) : Lean Socialist | Region Hot 3 Issues: Immigration, Environment, War

Non-Continentals (HI, CU, PR, AK) : Liberal | Region Hot 3 Issues: War, Trade, Government Efficiency

Swing States (MN, IA, NJ, DE, FL) : Lean Liberal | Region Hot 3 Issues: War, Economy, Morality

 

Congress

Liberals 52/104 Senate 42% US Rep

Conservatives 50/104 Senate 46% US Rep

Socialists 2/104 Senate 12% US Rep

RP Note: Conservatives begin to regain seats in the Senate, while a surprise Socialist hold on their House seats and a small set of wins by the Liberals led them to knock out the Conservative majority.

 

@Hestia11 events tomorrow or the day after.

OOC: You said in the SOTU that there was room for an insurgent ticket for Libertarianism and Populism and both the parties that tried to run on those issues got absolutely nowhere, please don't mention something like that again if you are not going to stick by it.

Wallace congratulates the President-elect and thanks all the voters who voted for the Soc Lab Ticket and Congressional Candidates.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, MBDemSoc said:

OOC: You said in the SOTU that there was room for an insurgent ticket for Libertarianism and Populism and both the parties that tried to run on those issues got absolutely nowhere, please don't mention something like that again if you are not going to stick by it.

Wallace congratulates the President-elect and thanks all the voters who voted for the Soc Lab Ticket and Congressional Candidates.

Don't be mad at me when the Libertarian Party absolutely betrayed their own beliefs, and that your party still has above 10% as a socialist party.

 

You held the House, and trying to be populist as a Socialist Party doesn't change much from your original platform. 

 

Also, if you were truly populist, you would actually have a platform of the People, not just about some ideas that you can sacrifice from Socialism.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Kingthero said:

Don't be mad at me when the Libertarian Party absolutely betrayed their own beliefs, and that your party still has above 10% as a socialist party.

 

You held the House, and trying to be populist as a Socialist Party doesn't change much from your original platform. 

 

Also, if you were truly populist, you would actually have a platform of the People, not just about some ideas that you can sacrifice from Socialism.

 

OOC: I am not angry I am just asking for you not to get people's hopes up if you are not going to follow through or at least semi follow through with your teasing of success for certain ideologies at certain times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MBDemSoc said:

OOC: I am not angry I am just asking for you not to get people's hopes up if you are not going to follow through or at least semi follow through with your teasing of success for certain ideologies at certain times.

If done right there was a huge chance; could have seen 20%+ margins again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Kingthero said:

If done right there was a huge chance; could have seen 20%+ margins again.

OOC: Dude, it's really hard to read the mood of a nation with just a few lines and also I tried to address all the issues that were facing the nation from my point of view while also adapting what I felt comfortable with moving on and also brought back the popular candidate from the 1940 election I don't really know what else could be done without me shifting too radically from my and the in roleplay party's views.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, MBDemSoc said:

OOC: Dude, it's really hard to read the mood of a nation with just a few lines and also I tried to address all the issues that were facing the nation from my point of view while also adapting what I felt comfortable with moving on and also brought back the popular candidate from the 1940 election I don't really know what else could be done without me shifting too radically from my and the in roleplay party's views.

Well, I know that haha. Just know that you've already kept the socialists alive this long, and thats an accomplishment of its own.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

National Strength: We rank 2nd in the list of the top 10 countries: Russia, United States, Germany, France, China, Great Britain, Mexico, Austria, Sweden, Spain.

Military Strength: Our professional army is 40,000 men and 75 ships, with a reserve army of 120,000 men solely for defense. We have naval bases in Hawaii, Cuba, Panama, St. Pierre and Miquelon, American Polynesia, and Japan.

Foreign Affairs: China is going crazy. Their borders extend from China/Korea all the way to Modern Day Persia. For reference, Russian borders are pre-our timeline-WW1 Russian borders.

Military: Our military is semi-active. Some of our military is in Pacific Bases, while others are static.

Economy: The economy takes another small dip after uncertain Congressional battles.

Trade: Trade continues to take a sharp dive after the fight over denationalization worries both the public and private shippers.

Budget: Our budget is currently balanced, and it has no debt. Our budget consists of the income of 45% taxes 40% tariff 10% overseas territories/canals and 5% nationalized industries, and the expenditure of 60% military 15% gov. upkeep 25% infrastructure and 0% surplus growth. (SD: 30)

Social Harmony: The country is united, and it has stabilized its unity decline.

Immigration: Immigration levels slow the rapid exponential growth, however the huge influx of immigration has led to housing shortages and high unemployment.

Mood of the people: People are becoming scared of the global affairs.

Party Power: Liberals take a VP induced majority in the Senate, while the House leans Liberal with Socialist cooperation.

 

Events and Decisions for January 1949 - January 1953 for Pres. Langford @Hestia11

1) Russian-Chinese Alliance

With the entrance of a new President, immediate fear is raised among the population. Russia has begun mobilizing its army, just after Russia and China signed an official military alliance. Courtesy of increased funding, spies were sent out to learn of the plans, but they were caught and killed on foreign soil.

2) League of Nations Military Alliance

Should we try to unite the League of Nations, which China and Russia are not apart of at this time, against the new superalliance?

3) Economic Sanctions

Shall we impose economic sanctions on the superalliance, even if it may hurt our economy?

4) Military Status

Your military advisers have just stated that in order to combat a potential superalliance threat alone, we need to quintuple our active military and double our navy.

5) Technology Progresses

We have finally been able to master vehicle use in warfare. Shall we invest into better bomb delivery devices (rockets), bigger bombs (nukes), or armored vehicles (tanks)?

6) Libertarians Propose a Deal

Libertarians in the Liberals have proposed that they will support pro-war measures if you finally denationalize the shipping industry.

7) Canada Requests Membership

After decades of tension, Canada finally requests to join the American Alliance, the alliance in which North and South America are all in a mutual defensive pact against outside invaders.

😎 Morality Back in Question

Recently, with the advancement of technology, there has grown doubt among professors regarding creationist approaches. Legally, creationism is practically enforced, and in some States evolution is even banned. There are even those professors that somehow find a middle ground, involving how God created evolution and its just another gift of God. What stance will the President take?

9) Immigrant Segregation

In California, it has been likely that school districts have been purposefully set up in order to segregate against immigrants populations, like hispanics and asians. Some are calling for the President to take a stand against this.

10) Free

Anything not included here you wish to implement?

 

Congressional Majority Opposition @Reagan04

1) Block Measures

As a majority opposition, you have the ability to block specific actions by the President. While I simulate votes and sometimes things change, this block will be much more meaningful than the usual blocking. You gain one of these a year, with a cap of 4. Note that you have these if you are really against something

2) Proposal

As a majority opposition, you can likely propose and pass bills, though likely to be veto'ed. You gain the ability to propose one bill a year, with a cap of 4. Note this if you feel creative one day, or are really hostile against a specific policy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, Kingthero said:

Well, I know that haha. Just know that you've already kept the socialists alive this long, and thats an accomplishment of its own.

Great. 🙄

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Irrelevant stuff on the LIBT party: Woodburrow assassinated, Curtis deemed mentally ill and not fit to run in the party, new leader Harris Cosh (pretty much todays Adam Kokesh) deems to revitalize true LIBT values, not the big left Woodburrow silently supported.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I won't be able to get to this until tomorrow morning at the earliest. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, NYConservative said:

Irrelevant stuff on the LIBT party: Woodburrow assassinated, Curtis deemed mentally ill and not fit to run in the party, new leader Harris Cosh (pretty much todays Adam Kokesh) deems to revitalize true LIBT values, not the big left Woodburrow silently supported.

This all seems a lot ASB...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/27/2018 at 7:51 PM, Kingthero said:

With the entrance of a new President, immediate fear is raised among the population. Russia has begun mobilizing its army, just after Russia and China signed an official military alliance. Courtesy of increased funding, spies were sent out to learn of the plans, but they were caught and killed on foreign soil.

 

Pres. Langford is deeply concerned about the threat Russia and China pose to the world. She will broadcast a major speech on the news channel dedicated to government announcements, detailing her plan.

1) Establish a broad base of military alliances in Europe, with Germany, France, Britain, Turkey, and other minor European nations. This could be in a League of Nations format.

2) Connect with Central Asian and Southeast Asian nations like Thailand and Persia, as well as our allies in Japan

3) Establish superior naval tactics between us and our allies to adequately be able to tame the Russian and Chinese threats. 

4) Begin to establish a military base somewhere in Europe

On 9/27/2018 at 7:51 PM, Kingthero said:

Shall we impose economic sanctions on the superalliance, even if it may hurt our economy?

 

I think all parties would be willing to establish sanctions on these economies. After all, safety over prosperity. 

On 9/27/2018 at 7:51 PM, Kingthero said:

Your military advisers have just stated that in order to combat a potential superalliance threat alone, we need to quintuple our active military and double our navy.

 

We are worried about the effects this could have on our economy. I would need further details about what this would cause before I commit to a decision as big as this. We would also want to know what countries are willing to join our alliance to see what sort of troop increase would be practical.

On 9/27/2018 at 7:51 PM, Kingthero said:

We have finally been able to master vehicle use in warfare. Shall we invest into better bomb delivery devices (rockets), bigger bombs (nukes), or armored vehicles (tanks)?

 

We would like to invest first into bomb delivery devices. After all, if we have bombs and have outdated ways to use them, there really isn't a way to use them at all. After that, we would see armored vehicles being developed.

On 9/27/2018 at 7:51 PM, Kingthero said:

Libertarians in the Liberals have proposed that they will support pro-war measures if you finally denationalize the shipping industry.

 

The Liberal position has not changed. They can oppose pro-safety measures at their own expense. 

On 9/27/2018 at 7:51 PM, Kingthero said:

After decades of tension, Canada finally requests to join the American Alliance, the alliance in which North and South America are all in a mutual defensive pact against outside invaders.

 

The US would support Canadian membership enthusiastically.

On 9/27/2018 at 7:51 PM, Kingthero said:

Recently, with the advancement of technology, there has grown doubt among professors regarding creationist approaches. Legally, creationism is practically enforced, and in some States evolution is even banned. There are even those professors that somehow find a middle ground, involving how God created evolution and its just another gift of God. What stance will the President take?

 

We officially will take the stance that we support the lifting of evolution bans. The President says she officially believes that God created evolution, but will not look for ways to institute it into schools besides simply teaching what it says.

On 9/27/2018 at 7:51 PM, Kingthero said:

In California, it has been likely that school districts have been purposefully set up in order to segregate against immigrants populations, like hispanics and asians. Some are calling for the President to take a stand against this.

 

President Langford says that it is a simple decision. She says that she is against any sort of segregation, and will work with the State of California to undo these anti-immigrant measures. She proposes limiting schools to a certain radius by an independent city commission. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hestia11 said:

Pres. Langford is deeply concerned about the threat Russia and China pose to the world. She will broadcast a major speech on the news channel dedicated to government announcements, detailing her plan.

1) Establish a broad base of military alliances in Europe, with Germany, France, Britain, Turkey, and other minor European nations. This could be in a League of Nations format.

2) Connect with Central Asian and Southeast Asian nations like Thailand and Persia, as well as our allies in Japan

3) Establish superior naval tactics between us and our allies to adequately be able to tame the Russian and Chinese threats. 

4) Begin to establish a military base somewhere in Europe

I think all parties would be willing to establish sanctions on these economies. After all, safety over prosperity. 

We are worried about the effects this could have on our economy. I would need further details about what this would cause before I commit to a decision as big as this. We would also want to know what countries are willing to join our alliance to see what sort of troop increase would be practical.

We would like to invest first into bomb delivery devices. After all, if we have bombs and have outdated ways to use them, there really isn't a way to use them at all. After that, we would see armored vehicles being developed.

The Liberal position has not changed. They can oppose pro-safety measures at their own expense. 

The US would support Canadian membership enthusiastically.

We officially will take the stance that we support the lifting of evolution bans. The President says she officially believes that God created evolution, but will not look for ways to institute it into schools besides simply teaching what it says.

President Langford says that it is a simple decision. She says that she is against any sort of segregation, and will work with the State of California to undo these anti-immigrant measures. She proposes limiting schools to a certain radius by an independent city commission. 

 

The Soc Lab party supports the military and economic sanction measures proposed by the President so long as she makes sure the Alliances are for defensive purposes only otherwise we may lose the trust of the nations that are neutral in the rivalry between the American Alliance and the Russo-Chinese Alliance and also due to the Soc Lab Party's longstanding tradition of Neutrality in Foreign Affairs.

 

The Soc Lab Party will support the lifting of the ban of the teaching of the theory of evolution as the party strongly believes in the upholding of the First Amendment.

 

The Soc Lab Party will support the undoing of segregation measures in California schools and the creation of catchment areas for schools as well.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, MBDemSoc said:

The Soc Lab party supports the military and economic sanction measures proposed by the President so long as she makes sure the Alliances are for defensive purposes only otherwise we may lose the trust of the nations that are neutral in the rivalry between the American Alliance and the Russo-Chinese Alliance and also due to the Soc Lab Party's longstanding tradition of Neutrality in Foreign Affairs.

 

The President clarifies that it would be a defensive alliance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Hestia11 said:

The President clarifies that it would be a defensive alliance

The party supports it then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/29/2018 at 3:54 PM, Hestia11 said:

Pres. Langford is deeply concerned about the threat Russia and China pose to the world. She will broadcast a major speech on the news channel dedicated to government announcements, detailing her plan.

1) Establish a broad base of military alliances in Europe, with Germany, France, Britain, Turkey, and other minor European nations. This could be in a League of Nations format.

2) Connect with Central Asian and Southeast Asian nations like Thailand and Persia, as well as our allies in Japan

3) Establish superior naval tactics between us and our allies to adequately be able to tame the Russian and Chinese threats. 

4) Begin to establish a military base somewhere in Europe

 

On 9/29/2018 at 3:54 PM, Hestia11 said:

I think all parties would be willing to establish sanctions on these economies. After all, safety over prosperity. 

 

On 9/29/2018 at 3:54 PM, Hestia11 said:

The US would support Canadian membership enthusiastically.

The Conservatives are united with the Liberals as we have often been on the topics of Foreign Policy and will support all these goals.

On 9/29/2018 at 3:54 PM, Hestia11 said:

We are worried about the effects this could have on our economy. I would need further details about what this would cause before I commit to a decision as big as this. We would also want to know what countries are willing to join our alliance to see what sort of troop increase would be practical.

The President's concerns are noble but we had wishes for a larger commitment and more forceful action from the White House.

On 9/29/2018 at 3:54 PM, Hestia11 said:

We would like to invest first into bomb delivery devices. After all, if we have bombs and have outdated ways to use them, there really isn't a way to use them at all. After that, we would see armored vehicles being developed.

We are delighted to see more investment in the military

On 9/29/2018 at 3:54 PM, Hestia11 said:

The Liberal position has not changed. They can oppose pro-safety measures at their own expense. 

The Conservatives once again extend the olive branch to the Libertarians as it is now clear that the Liberal party is no home for them and the Conservatives are a much better place to pursue their policy goals, particularly on the economy.

On 9/29/2018 at 3:54 PM, Hestia11 said:

We officially will take the stance that we support the lifting of evolution bans. The President says she officially believes that God created evolution, but will not look for ways to institute it into schools besides simply teaching what it says.

Conservative leaders, especially the devout Former Vice President as well as Florida Senator, excoriate the Presidents stance saying that it is out of touch with real Americans and that that positions is only found in high academia and not the halls of Middle America. The Conservatives reinforce their Creationist position and continue to use their state parties to back that and remind voters vigorously of where each party stands on the issue.

On 9/29/2018 at 3:54 PM, Hestia11 said:

President Langford says that it is a simple decision. She says that she is against any sort of segregation, and will work with the State of California to undo these anti-immigrant measures. She proposes limiting schools to a certain radius by an independent city commission. 

While this is not a Federal issue, the Conservative Governor of California, Merle Dorren, has been contacted by Conservative Leadership and told that that the official party position is to crack down on education discrimination in the way of zoning. He has officially made a statement supporting legislation to do so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Hestia11

Quote

Pres. Langford is deeply concerned about the threat Russia and China pose to the world. She will broadcast a major speech on the news channel dedicated to government announcements, detailing her plan.

1) Establish a broad base of military alliances in Europe, with Germany, France, Britain, Turkey, and other minor European nations. This could be in a League of Nations format.

2) Connect with Central Asian and Southeast Asian nations like Thailand and Persia, as well as our allies in Japan

3) Establish superior naval tactics between us and our allies to adequately be able to tame the Russian and Chinese threats. 

4) Begin to establish a military base somewhere in Europe

The alliances have been created among the League of Nations, for defensive purposes. Thailand doesn't exist, as it was British when it was invaded. Persia will accept an alliance if we let them in one. Our tactics are on point, but our allies are stubborn. We fail to create any base due to how general the location is.

 

Quote

I think all parties would be willing to establish sanctions on these economies. After all, safety over prosperity. 

Sanctions are implemented.

 

Quote

We are worried about the effects this could have on our economy. I would need further details about what this would cause before I commit to a decision as big as this. We would also want to know what countries are willing to join our alliance to see what sort of troop increase would be practical.

We can double our army before going to debt if current economic trends continue. If our economy improves, we can triple it.

 

Quote

We would like to invest first into bomb delivery devices. After all, if we have bombs and have outdated ways to use them, there really isn't a way to use them at all. After that, we would see armored vehicles being developed.

Research is halted due to the unorganized war department I swear you Liberals have the worst time with the military

 

Quote

The Liberal position has not changed. They can oppose pro-safety measures at their own expense. 

Somehow, Liberals whip the Libertarians so hard they shut up for now.

 

Quote

The US would support Canadian membership enthusiastically.

Canada is in.

 

Quote

We officially will take the stance that we support the lifting of evolution bans. The President says she officially believes that God created evolution, but will not look for ways to institute it into schools besides simply teaching what it says.

The country is angered that the President has taken such a middle stance on an issue so heavily biased towards one side.

 

Quote

President Langford says that it is a simple decision. She says that she is against any sort of segregation, and will work with the State of California to undo these anti-immigrant measures. She proposes limiting schools to a certain radius by an independent city commission. 

The President could not get anything done; However, thanks to the Conservatives, this issue has been solved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Former President Theodore "Ted" Hillsbury found dead in his Indianapolis home July 23rd, 1954 at age 90.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×