Jump to content
270soft Forum
ThePotatoWalrus

IQ Poll

IQ 🅱oll  

20 members have voted

  1. 1. What is your IQ?

  2. 2. Where did you take an IQ test?

    • Online (free)
    • Online (paid)
      0
    • School
    • Work
      0
    • Other


Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Reagan04 said:

 

Correct, independent sustainability is not one of the seven recognized requirement of life, growth, reproduction (in a species with this ability through sex cells), heredity of traits (99% of the time chromosomatic, very important facet), homeostasis, metabolism, cellular structure, and reaction to stimuli.

Fire meets of four of those. :P

That was pointed in my science class.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Patine said:

Fire meets of four of those. :P

That was pointed in my science class.

Well lucky we need to meet all seven 😛 .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, MRA said:

YOU are a fascist communist Islam-loving anti-christian state-sanctioned actor.

 

As a member of the conservative socialist progressive right, I support this totally logical statement

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, MRA said:

Evolution is a scam. Evolutionists believe that if you put some worms on an island and return in a few million years you'll find people,elephants etc.

I've debunked evolution, the dogma of deniers

@WVProgressive @vcczar @Patine @ThePotatoWalrus

 

Even as a Christian i'm 99% sure that's not how evolution works, or what evolutionists believe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, ThePotatoWalrus said:

Even as a Christian i'm 99% sure that's not how evolution works, or what evolutionists believe

It is I studied evolution for a decade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, MRA said:

Evolution is a scam. Evolutionists believe that if you put some worms on an island and return in a few million years you'll find people,elephants etc.

I've debunked evolution, the dogma of deniers

@WVProgressive @vcczar @Patine @ThePotatoWalrus

 

Well not humans and elephants but in millions of years they'd evolve to suit their environments. What do you think evolution is, exactly? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, WVProgressive said:

Well not humans and elephants but in millions of years they'd evolve to suit their environments. What do you think evolution is, exactly? 

A naturalistic attempt at explaining life.

I don't see how one make the logical gap from adapts to environment to morphs into different species.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, MRA said:

A naturalistic attempt at explaining life.

I don't see how one make the logical gap from adapts to environment to morphs into different species.

So you're saying that you believe in micro but not macro evolution?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, WVProgressive said:

So you're saying that you believe in micro but not macro evolution?

Don't feed the troll!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Patine said:

Don't feed the troll!

Prove that here he is trolling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, WVProgressive said:

So you're saying that you believe in micro but not macro evolution?

Yes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, NYrepublican said:

Prove that here he is trolling.

The assumption that he is trolling is the MOST FLATTERING assumption I could make of him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, MRA said:

Yes.

Well over millions and billions of years mutation, migration, genetic drift, and natural selection, leads to macro evolution, it just takes time, you wouldn't be able to see it in your lifetime.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, WVProgressive said:

Well over millions and billions of years mutation, migration, genetic drift, and natural selection, leads to macro evolution, it just takes time, you wouldn't be able to see it in your lifetime.

Earth has only existed for 4.543 billion years during which for much of it's time it was inhospitable to life. Can you demonstrate that macroevolution while theoretically possible fits a reasonable timespan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, MRA said:

Earth has only existed for 4.543 billion years during which for much of it's time it was inhospitable to life. Can you demonstrate that macroevolution while theoretically possible fits a reasonable timespan.

Earth has had life on it for 3.8 billion years (possible earlier) that is plenty of time for evolution to reach it's current point. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, WVProgressive said:

Earth has had life on it for 3.8 billion years (possible earlier) that is plenty of time for evolution to reach it's current point. 

Once you source that I'll accept macroevolution.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, WVProgressive said:

I'm willing to accept that

Though it must be noted that carbon dating isn't very reliable https://www.nytimes.com/1990/05/31/us/errors-are-feared-in-carbon-dating.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, MRA said:

I'm willing to accept that

Though it must be noted that carbon dating isn't very reliable https://www.nytimes.com/1990/05/31/us/errors-are-feared-in-carbon-dating.html

He's mostly right. Carbon dating isn't 100% reliable but it is better than you probably think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, ThePotatoWalrus said:

He's mostly right. Carbon dating isn't 100% reliable but it is better than you probably think.

I just heard someone say the dinasours died 4,200 years ago. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, NYrepublican said:

I just heard someone say the dinasours died 4,200 years ago. 

No comment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, NYrepublican said:

I just heard someone say the dinasours died 4,200 years ago. 

The oldest Egyptian hieroglyphics and Sumerian cuneiform trace from about that time. Why didn't they mention such impressive, gargantuan beasts at all?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Patine said:

The oldest Egyptian hieroglyphics and Sumerian cuneiform trace from about that time. Why didn't they mention such impressive, gargantuan beasts at all?

It was in a debate this guy had with a designer. I can't believe he didn't point that out. (I'll send you the link if you want @ThePotatoWalrus)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×