Jump to content
270soft Forum
NYrepublican

Thoughts?

Recommended Posts

Guest

I guess we'll see the leftists on this forum rushing to the defence of the religion of peace. Islam and muslims has no place in European society and should be deported together with the leftists that seeks to defend it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, koneke said:

I guess we'll see the leftists on this forum rushing to the defence of the religion of peace. Islam and muslims has no place in European society and should be deported together with the leftists that seeks to defend it.

Give them helicopter rides

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎2017‎-‎07‎-‎31 at 0:42 PM, NYrepublican said:

If Islam and Christianity, as well were practiced in the proper spirit and meaning they were envisioned in and their true messages are framed in, what a far better world this would be.

On ‎2017‎-‎07‎-‎31 at 2:36 PM, koneke said:

I guess we'll see the leftists on this forum rushing to the defence of the religion of peace. Islam and muslims has no place in European society and should be deported together with the leftists that seeks to defend it.

Except that, despite the plaintiff, willfully ignorant protestations of brainwashed sheep like you koneke (and so many others today, it would seem), there is no such political ideology, philosophy, stance, or any other such sociological construct called "leftism." Such a thing and concept doesn't exist and never has. There are political ideologies on the left-wing of the political spectrum - quite a few - but they differ from each other in most ways, and quite sharply and drastically, collectively, and have very little true commonality or similarity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Patine said:

there is no such political ideology, philosophy, stance, or any other such sociological construct called "leftism."

Using the word "leftism" for left-leaning parties technically qualifies as a social construct to identify left-leaning groups. 

Here's a definition I found of the term "social construct"

"A social construct or construction concerns the meaning, notion, or connotation placed on an object or event by a society, and adopted by the inhabitants of that society with respect to how they view or deal with the object or event. In that respect, a social construct as an idea would be widely accepted as natural by the society, but may or may not represent a reality shared by those outside the society, and would be an invention or artifice of that society."

Society can also apply to groups or factions within that society which would develop their own social constructs or societal standards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, NYrepublican said:

Using the word "leftism" for left-leaning parties technically qualifies as a social construct to identify left-leaning groups. 

Here's a definition I found of the term "social construct"

"A social construct or construction concerns the meaning, notion, or connotation placed on an object or event by a society, and adopted by the inhabitants of that society with respect to how they view or deal with the object or event. In that respect, a social construct as an idea would be widely accepted as natural by the society, but may or may not represent a reality shared by those outside the society, and would be an invention or artifice of that society."

Society can also apply to groups or factions within that society which would develop their own social constructs or societal standards.

However, his usage of the word implies a uniformity of thought and opinion, and a truth in bad stereotypes perpetuated as a political attack form alone, that does not actually contain even the genuine qualities you may be trying to point out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Patine According to Google Leftism is an actual word.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Patine said:

However, his usage of the word implies a uniformity of thought and opinion, and a truth in bad stereotypes perpetuated as a political attack form alone, that does not actually contain even the genuine qualities you may be trying to point out.

You knew exactly what he meant. With all due respect, and not wanting to cause conflict, I assume you called him out for using the word as it was the easiest flaw you could point out in his argument. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, ThePotatoWalrus said:

You knew exactly what he meant. With all due respect, and not wanting to cause conflict, I assume you called him out for using the word as it was the easiest flaw you could point out in his argument. 

As I had mentioned earlier here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also @ThePotatoWalrus debates with Koneke very quickly get out of hand. You weren't here before he was indefinitely moderated for that but rarely, if ever, does good come out of debating Koneke.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@ThePotatoWalrus I refer to posts like this

On 6/3/2017 at 9:39 AM, koneke said:

I am speaking facts, the 18 Senators who voted against the immigration act 1965 were all southern senators from Jim Crow States.

If the klan had been active in electing northern and western senators... america wouldnt be this somorra, gomorra blending races...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some more you might enjoy  @ThePotatoWalrus  

- A response to Reagan04 regarding America

On 7/14/2017 at 1:40 PM, Reagan04 said:

(This is a mistake, bless me o holy @vcczar and @Patine) America is the land of equal opportunity, everyone is guaranteed an equal start, it is what makes America great, as I noted people have the right to be racist, but it is certainly not America, and for you to say nothing is more America, I can think of a few: Liberty, Freedom, Justice all come to mind. And yes the Supreme Court found Miscegenation unconstitutional in the Landmark 1967 Supreme Court Case, Loving v Virginia. And the Constitution was amended to make the practice of Slavery illegal December 6th, 1865. Nations, like people, grow and change, there is no doubt in my mind America is the greatest nation on Earth and always has been, but we don't get to stay that way by sticking with UnGodly traditions.

On 7/14/2017 at 2:04 PM, koneke said:

That is bullshit. The "American Dream" narrative was made up by Israel Zangwill. It has nothing to do with America but is a Hollywood fantasy. You say that America is the greatest nation on Earth and always has been. America is only a big and important country because of it's huge population of predominantly high IQ people. The immigration from Mexico will change that very soon if you don't make them leave because they're going to take over America. White supremacy and capitalism and the rule of law is linked together, because those things comes from a Northern European tradition.

-Regarding the most important years in U.S history

On 7/7/2017 at 6:56 PM, koneke said:

1965 with the Hart Celler act because it made USA a third world country.

-He once posted a now removed photo of a (not very good looking) black woman on the left (phone selfie) and a (better looking) white woman on the computer (evidently a webcam photo) on the right. Then he said something along the lines of "I hope you're not thinking of f--king this black woman.This ugliness is caused by black homosexuality." or something along those lines.

-Regarding Homosexuals and political power which led to his first ban

Koneke:It is a problem that homosexuals have political power, because gays usually have an indifference to the future because they do not reproduce.As an example i can point to Angela Merkel who has no children and is behind the catastrophic handling of the migrant crisis. She simply has no reason to care for the future, and this is the result. I'd want heterosexuals like Trump who have many children he truly loves which means he has a big incentive to care for the future and the lives of the next generations.

JNewt:Not only is this completely untrue and factually inaccurate, it is moronic.  Gay people still have relatives and can have their own biological children, have you ever heard of a surrogate?  Plus they can adopt children, and I guarantee you they love them just as much as they would love their biological children, and care about their future just as much.  And Angela Merkel is heterosexual, she's had two husbands.

Koneke:You're allowed to think for yourself, sometimes i think in generals and averages but only write absolutes. If you're not able to grasp that. Then that is also fine, then you won't get a lot out of my writing.

MichaelsDiamonds:You know, you're beyond any point of reconciliation. "Gay people don't care about the future," is a brand new level of ridiculousness.

Koneke:You're the one who don't understand anything, it is pretty simple. No children = no incentive to care about the future. If you can't grasp that 1st grade might be where you should start over again.

Chunkbuster11:Do you have children? Because if you don't I worry that you aren't concerned about the future of this thread. We are going to rely on our young pupils to come back to this and reflect on the Extremely Early 2020 Predictions. And you are polluting it with what I fear could be future disregarding childless junk. But hey, I like to think in generals and averages so I could be wrong.

Koneke:I hope you get get AIDS, but considering your profile picture you probably already have it. (note:Comment was removed by koneke before the thread was locked. That's what he said from memory though.)

Chunkbuster11:I'm going to take this as a no on the children question. (replying after the comment had been deleted)

Koneke:take it as whatever you like, go on with your degenerate sexuality and maybe Orlando might happen to you some day.

Chunkbuster11:Can a person without children even have a desire for something like to happen some day i.e. the future?

Jvikings1:We have gone way too far over the line.  I suggest this conversation be ended.  The offending comments have been reported.

Vcczar: Admin_270 , forum member Koneke removed the comment eventually, but had you read it, it would definitely warrant a permanent banning. I hope the person it was directed to, Chunkbuster11, didn't read it. I'm wondering, what are the rules for getting banned from the forum? Surely, there must be some sort of line that cannot be crossed. 

-On White Nationalism

Koneke:I am a White nationalist, i support states rights and a limited federal government if it is good for Whites. I don't think you should support states rights no matter what. If it serves the interest of whites it is good, if it doesn't it is bad.

-On propoganda

Koneke:Propaganda is recognised as a wanting to hit the receivers feelings. As long as i am factual it isn't propaganda. Most of my claims are rooted in historical truths. You just won't recognise it as being true as which i am unhappy and wish for you to get the truth

-On Native Americans

Koneke:It's not my fault. In school i hardly hear anything about race or the races so i have to dig up myself what i can find. What i have seen is that native americans came from Siberia during the last ice age because you could walk to alaska and they killed the real native americans. The Aboriginals is a mystery though because how did they came the long way from Africa but i still think they're africans because their intelligence or IQ is close to africans, but isnt conclusive because it could be environment that made that IQ.

-on IQ

Koneke:I said that it wasn't something that you could conclude anything from, but would be a thing that'd point you at that hypothesis.https://iq-research.info/en/page/average-iq-by-country .Equatorial Guinea has an average IQ of 59.

Patine:Equatorial Guinea also has a LOT social, educational, and developmental problems that are probably the REAL reason for that statistic, not the race of the majority of the population inherently and genetically...

-On Nazis and the KKK

Koneke:The KKK and the National Socialists cherished it [inherited IQ based on race]? The KKK wanted to have white supremacy i dont think they cared about genetic inheritance or stuff like that.

The National Socialists thought that the races should fight each other so the best race could win.. i dont see how that is genetics and intelligence.

You have been debunked

Legolasredbard:Where are you getting this information from? If the National Socialists wanted the races to fight each other for supremacy, why did they round up millions of people and take them into concentration camps. If this theory was true then we would of had a very different Holocaust, where instead of genocide we would of had ring fights between Slavs and Ayrans and Jews. If you're being serious, then I truly apologise, but this sounds ridiculous

Koneke:

it makes sense if you look at the races ecologically.

We're like the species of nature in a constant struggle to dominate.

The Jews ended that struggle with Christianity, Capitalism and Communism.

They're ideologies that preached peace and unity between tribes and races.

About the Holocaust. The Germans had a way of seeing things that Jews were communists and communists were jews, so killing the jews was killing enemies, (they were at war with communism, see eastern front) They saw it as a part of the war not a genocide.

Historians have made the conclusion that it was an extermination campaign that was done because they just wanted to genocide them, but that is not true.

In the start Germany had a policy of emigration for Jews, but then the war came so they couldn't get rid of them (sorry for offensive terms)

Legolasredbard:

Woah woah woah haud the bus! The Nazis set out with the intent to commit genocide. It wasn't part of the war, it was a deliberate attempt to eradicate the Jewish populace in Europe. Remember, although the Final Solution was created during the war, the Germans had been killing Jews for much longer than that. Well I believe that's been enough debate for tonight. I'm going to sleep

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Koneke is a very special kind of user, to express my feelings about him in a forum rule abiding way :) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎2017‎-‎07‎-‎31 at 0:42 PM, NYrepublican said:

You're absolutely correct, @NYrepublican, I made a mistake responding to koneke again. However, next time I, or someone else makes that error, could you please express why it's an error in a way other than yet another iteration of the "Essential Quotable koneke?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Patine said:

You're absolutely correct, @NYrepublican, I made a mistake responding to koneke again. However, next time I, or someone else makes that error, could you please express why it's an error in a way other than yet another iteration of the "Essential Quotable koneke?"

Those were actually provided for @ThePotatoWalrus's amusement since he wasn't on the forum when they were said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, NYrepublican said:

Those were actually provided for @ThePotatoWalrus's amusement since he wasn't on the forum when they were said.

Lmaoooo. This has been the best trade deal in the history of trade deals. Bigly.

But I wonder if anyone thought Koneke was me trolling, since I left the day before my birthday and his account was created the day after my birthday.

@Patine, @CalebsParadox, did you guys think this? Lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, ThePotatoWalrus said:

Lmaoooo. This has been the best trade deal in the history of trade deals. Bigly.

But I wonder if anyone thought Koneke was me trolling, since I left the day before my birthday and his account was created the day after my birthday.

@Patine, @CalebsParadox, did you guys think this? Lol.

Nope. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, ThePotatoWalrus said:

Lmaoooo. This has been the best trade deal in the history of trade deals. Bigly.

But I wonder if anyone thought Koneke was me trolling, since I left the day before my birthday and his account was created the day after my birthday.

@Patine, @CalebsParadox, did you guys think this? Lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×