Jump to content
270soft Forum
LegolasRedbard

UK General Election Poll 2017

UK General Election 2017  

31 members have voted

  1. 1. Who are you backing in the UK election in June?

    • Conservatives
    • Labour
    • UKIP
    • Lib Dems
    • Greens
      0
    • SNP
      0
    • Plaid Cymru
      0
    • SDLP
      0
    • Sinn Fein
      0
    • DUP
      0
    • UUP
      0
    • Alliance
      0
    • BNP
      0
    • Monster Raving Loony
    • Other
      0
  2. 2. Who do you think would make the best Prime Minister?

    • Theresa May
    • Jeremy Corbyn
    • Tim Farron
    • Paul Nuttal
    • Caroline Lucas
    • Howling Laud Hope


Recommended Posts

Guest
5 minutes ago, HomosexualSocialist said:

Why is it insane? Multiculturism is a great thing. 

I don't really care about the "race" argument I just can't stomach what you're saying. 

obama is not a socialist.

Really? From what I could see trump is improving his own life. I don't believe that he geniunely wants to make every american's lives better. 

I'll stop arguing with you now, your views seem uncompromisable.

Multiculturism, i guess you mean multiculturalism. Works great as long as all races give up fighting for their own interests and fights for the collective interests of all citizens of the country. I have yet to see that anywhere. Maybe in Utopia land, it worked really great.

Obama is a socialist, while his opponent was a free-market guy, aka Romney.

Trump wants to give people jobs, and their pride and dignity back.

You haven't presented anything i could obtain, any nice info that could change a bit of my world view.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Obama was involved in massive power grabs like DACA.Whatever you think about the merit of the executive orders he was taking powers that belong to congress and the states.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
4 minutes ago, HomosexualSocialist said:

So you really believe that there should be a white majority in the whole world?

I support the ethnic interests of my own group, which is the white group. You support the ethnic interests of your group, which is east asian.

The problem is that if current trends with low birth rates and immigration continues, whites will be extinct in 300 years time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
4 minutes ago, HomosexualSocialist said:

Lets not get off topic now.

Exactly, i think we should stop it now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, koneke said:

Multiculturism, i guess you mean multiculturalism. Works great as long as all races give up fighting for their own interests and fights for the collective interests of all citizens of the country. I have yet to see that anywhere. Maybe in Utopia land, it worked really great.

Obama is a socialist, while his opponent was a free-market guy, aka Romney.

Trump wants to give people jobs, and their pride and dignity back.

You haven't presented anything i could obtain, any nice info that could change a bit of my world view.

I don't really care about race. 

I'm just asking why should it be an issue nowadays. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, koneke said:

I support the ethnic interests of my own group, which is the white group. You support the ethnic interests of your group, which is east asian.

The problem is that if current trends with low birth rates and immigration continues, whites will be extinct in 300 years time.

You just said it, you support white interest. So it'd be hypocritical if you criticize minorities merely for supporting their interest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, HomosexualSocialist said:

I don't really care about race. 

I'm just asking why should it be an issue nowadays. 

Becuase of the coming demographics update:P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, republicaninnyc said:

Becuase of the coming demographics update:P

Really? There's a demographic update? I'd be happy to see that. I wish there are asians included since asians are a big minority on california and nevada.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
2 minutes ago, HomosexualSocialist said:

You just said it, you support white interest. So it'd be hypocritical if you criticize minorities merely for supporting their interest.

To sum it up, i think whites are being taken advantage over because they have chosen to give up their racial consciousness with the expectation that other races would follow suit, while other races hasn't. - koneke

i've summed it up here what my point is. I think non-whites are smart that they support their own ethnic interests, and my wish is that whites would do the same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, koneke said:

I support the ethnic interests of my own group, which is the white group. You support the ethnic interests of your group, which is east asian.

The problem is that if current trends with low birth rates and immigration continues, whites will be extinct in 300 years time.

So, what if "whites" get extinct? It doesnt necissarily mean that's a bad thing. In the future (I hope) race will no longer be an issue , people will eventually realize that there is only one race. And that is the human race.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, HomosexualSocialist said:

Really? There's a demographic update? I'd be happy to see that. I wish there are asians included since asians are a big minority on california and nevada.

the next thing on the list once the current stuff is done(two-round and direct popular vote and France 2017) The next updates will be for favorability and demographics and then systems like AV used in australia will be added for the australia 2016 campaign and my guess is with favorability implemented calculating the proportional seats in MMP wouldn't be too hard. The demographics will be completely user-modifiable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, koneke said:

To sum it up, i think whites are being taken advantage over because they have chosen to give up their racial consciousness with the expectation that other races would follow suit, while other races hasn't. - koneke

i've summed it up here what my point is. I think non-whites are smart that they support their own ethnic interests, and my wish is that whites would do the same.

Again I do not care because I am a part of the majority of the "race" here in my country.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
3 minutes ago, HomosexualSocialist said:

So, what if "whites" get extinct? It doesnt necissarily mean that's a bad thing. In the future (I hope) race will no longer be an issue , people will eventually realize that there is only one race. And that is the human race.

A race is an unique mix of genetic components, that shapes the behaviour and culture of the society that this race makes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, HomosexualSocialist said:

So, what if "whites" get extinct? It doesnt necissarily mean that's a bad thing. In the future (I hope) race will no longer be an issue , people will eventually realize that there is only one race. And that is the human race.

and then we'll fight an inter-galagtic war against planets in the Trappist 1 solar system:P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, republicaninnyc said:

the next thing on the list once the current stuff is done(two-round and direct popular vote and France 2017) The next updates will be for favorability and demographics and then systems like AV used in australia will be added for the australia 2016 campaign and my guess is with favorability implemented calculating the proportional seats in MMP wouldn't be too hard. The demographics will be completely user-modifiable.

I like the last part ^_^

Will there be an "appeal to a certain demographic" stat of some sort.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, HomosexualSocialist said:

I like the last part ^_^

Will there be an "appeal to a certain demographic" stat of some sort.

Anthony hasn't given any more specifics beyond what I said about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, republicaninnyc said:

and then we'll fight an inter-galagtic war against planets in the Trappist 1 solar system:P

LOL! :) I mean seriously I believe that theere has been so much division in the world now. I think everyone should put race aside and unite againts Terror. ISIS and other related or similar groups should be demolished and everyone should strive that there wont be more of some sort.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
2 minutes ago, republicaninnyc said:

Anthony hasn't given any more specifics beyond what I said about it.

I have always wondered. In a state you might have 40% far-left and 40% far-right on an issue in the real world, that is possible. The game does not seems to reflect that, atleast what i can comprehend with the regional center. Will there be a modification for that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, koneke said:

I have always wondered. In a state you might have 40% far-left and 40% far-right on an issue in the real world, that is possible. The game does not seems to reflect that, atleast what i can comprend with the regional center. Will there be a modification for that?

Maybe I'd like to see it though as it'd make the game more realistic.I'm not on the development team so I'm going by what I've read on the blog and in the comments section there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, republicaninnyc said:

Obama was involved in massive power grabs like DACA.Whatever you think about the merit of the executive orders he was taking powers that belong to congress and the states.

Do I agree with the idea behind DACA? Yes. Was it Obama overstepping his bounds? Yes. Was it socialism? Absolutely not.

so·cial·ism
ˈsōSHəˌlizəm/
noun
  1. a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
Obama did not advance towards this in DACA or any other executive order, nor can I recall him ever advocating for it in any speeches.
 
I repeat, calling Obama a socialist or communist is like calling Trump a fascist: perhaps they bear surface level similarities (Obamacare for Obama, authoritarianism for Trump) but beyond the surface level they're really not anything like a socialist or fascist (respectively). Obama is not Chavez, just as Trump is not Mussolini. Both comparisons are hyperbolic exaggerations from political opponents.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, President Garrett Walker said:

Do I agree with the idea behind DACA? Yes. Was it Obama overstepping his bounds? Yes. Was it socialism? Absolutely not.

so·cial·ism
ˈsōSHəˌlizəm/
noun
  1. a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
Obama did not advance towards this in DACA or any other executive order, nor can I recall him ever advocating for it in any speeches.
 
I repeat, calling Obama a socialist or communist is like calling Trump a fascist: perhaps they bear surface level similarities (Obamacare for Obama, authoritarianism for Trump) but beyond the surface level they're really not anything like a socialist or fascist (respectively). Obama is not Chavez, and Trump is not Mussolini.

I was not talking about socialism just about Obama's executive overreach in general.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, republicaninnyc said:

I was not talking about socialism just about Obama's executive overreach in general.

Koneke called him a socialist, HomosexualSocialist said he was not, and you replied with "Obama did take some really questionable measures when he was president." I was not certain whether you were intentionally implying he was, indeed, a socialist. I think DACA does good things, but I do agree that it was overreaching, I was just making sure you didn't think it was socialist. I also wish the House hadn't completely ignored the Senate's 2013 bipartisan immigration reform bill, which would have made DACA irrelevant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, President Garrett Walker said:

Koneke called him a socialist, HomosexualSocialist said he was not, and you replied with "Obama did take some really questionable measures when he was president." I was not certain whether you were intentionally implying he was, indeed, a socialist. I think DACA does good things, but I do agree that it was overreaching, I was just making sure you didn't think it was socialist. I also wish the House hadn't completely ignored the Senate's 2013 bipartisan immigration reform bill, which would have made DACA irrelevant.

I just post these things there since they're talking about Obama's philosophy and actions.  I didn't mean to infer that he was a socialist.

Bills tend to just sit in congress for awhile. In fact in 2014 supposedly more than 300 house bills were sitting on Harry Reid's desk.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, koneke said:

You're embarrassing yourself. Being ridiculous doesn't mean you say something intelligent. You're constantly coming with ad hominems which is a very dishonest way of debating. Please comment if you have a problem with my arguments, and tell me where i am wrong instead of these snarky comments that is aimed to put me down. You're a grown adult, now act as one.

Funny thing is, I've tried numerous times now to give responses and retorts to your uninformed, racist, skewed, and conspiracy-theory and fringe-author-inspired arguments based on educated, rational, logical, factual, and even a few attempted unbiased statements. But they have all seemed to impact you like a ball of ice slush against a reinforced titanium steel wall, triggering even more insultingly stupid, bigoted, and off-the-wall statements. Why last comment you had just griped about was moreso a matter of frustration and abdication of trying to seriously make you see reason and just lashing out in utter ambivalent annoyance rather than embarrassing myself by being ridiculous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...