The Libertarians point at that this "nonsense attack" has shown more sense than this entire statement, while showing the desperation attempts the Conservatives are making at an attack.
The Libertarians show the facts that denationalization issues is the Libertarian specialty, and prove over and over again the libertarians have picked a stronger anti-denationalization standpoint than the Conservatives weak, minor agenda for denationalization.
Furthermore, the Libertarian military stances are not only connected to our moderate base, but have no substances of aggression and mainly defense, and having the smarts of looking foward in the case of a China attack on either Russia or the US, which are both very likely, while we needle the fact that Mrs. Trebuano and Fmr. President Hillsbury both were weak on the Military stance during their administration.
In response to their lack of knowledge of the budget, a surplus won't mean much when, bar the socialist idea, we run out of money from that surplus from Mrs. Trebuano's egotistic idea of a budget, and a large government would help this issue tremendously, and not only put us in a larger surplus,but #1 on the national rankings.
We question if this hast, nonsensical rebuttal was made in an attempt to throw the Libertarians off, or the Conservatives on?
At any point during this campaign, it has been proven time and time again to the libertarian base that we are for their values, and not such extremist attempts to make sense.