All Activity
This stream auto-updates
- Today
-
Anyone want a 2018 NY Senatorial?
NYConservative replied to NYConservative's topic in President Infinity
@admin_270 I know chances are you wouldn't accept these terms, but maybe this could be an official campaign if I put in more 1. what-if candidates and 2. County flags/seals and other minor improvements? -
Name and office: Senator Adam Natesh Age: 42 Party: Libertarian Resident state: Texas VP nominee: VP Jorge Salvador (Hispanic Male) (LIB-TX) Key Issue to Defend in Theoretical Debate: Defense Strategies Platform (see State of the Union): National Strength: There is no reason we cannot move up in this list except for weak attempts at it by both the Conservatives and Liberals, both of which as you can see failed. Military Strength: More bases, more bases, more bases! We are in a time where both Russia and China could dominate the world and create a world war, we need to be strong and prepared for the threats, whereas the Conservatives have failed to finish making bases in Germany in 4 years and the Liberals haven't even made it as far as the Conservatives had in base making in the past. Foreign Affairs: We have consistently failed at condemning and taking down the Russian and Chinese regimes. Sanctions oh lord sanctions and rebel supporting, Try hard to stay anonymous except for the sanctions, and organize a League of Nations that would actually act on the issue at hand here, unlike the ones that have been organized in the past. Military: We must be on high alert. Conservatives have attempted to take the high road on the military, but no longer even mention the military in their campaigns. The Liberals have done more with the military but are still weak on the position. We must take a strong stance on this and continue to grow our military. Economy: Help small business, and small companies. Trade: Denationalize the trade industry further, maybe work with the Liberals and make a bipartisan bill for denationalization. Budget: We are in a good spot with this, and we should keep it that way. Social Harmony: No Comment. Immigration: Conservatives love to use immigration as a scare tactic against the hardworking people of America, and the Liberals take a more ignorant stance on this issue by pretending everything is fine. The issue is a moderate issue and is not important at the moment, but we should watch the issue closely. Mood of the people: No Comment. Party Power: We will attack the Conservatives and moderate Liberals, and try to bring them in to our cause. Popularity of the Incumbent: He is good, but we can do better with a Libertarian candidate being elected.
-
Please add election being affected by previous election feature
NYConservative replied to TheMiddlePolitical's topic in Game Feedback
The result to those is simple: leave no modifiers at all. Every modifier at 0 would make the past irrelevant as heck. -
I'd be interested in that. However, I won't have very much time until at least Christmas break as I'm taking mostly more difficult classes this semester which have taken up more of my time than previous semesters.
- Yesterday
-
OOC: Ok, I thought you might have misunderstood thinking that I was calling you a rock in the boast as in a physical rock weighing the ship of state down as opposed to a verbial rocking of the boat.
-
OOC: I know. But you know how things would go in an actual political arena lol. It'd be the same the other way around.
-
OOC: @Hestia11 All I said was that changing administration would rock the national boat lol, opposition is fine, I'm just saying we shouldn't switch right now since we need stability.
-
Okay, make an example of the Fortuity for me when you can and I'll attempt it. Unless you want a "Name" box, and then a text box. No icons, no sub titles. Then I can just make the one card real quick. Unless there will be categories like Executive, Judicial, Military, etc. Then I can make one for each. As far as these "meter" cards go, I could make those pretty easy. Let me mess around with an idea I have.
-
I'd also STRONGLY prefer scenarios that did not require the addendum in any way, shape, or form of third party software of any sort to properly play and enjoy - be it your spreadsheets here, or many of @NYrepublican's schemes in such a light.
-
That would be helpful. For photos, take only those photos that are public domain (wikipedia is good). Try to find photos of them at the height of their fame. Thus, Gingrich as Speaker. Ryan as Speaker. Obama as President. Santorum as Senator (or as 2012 candidate), Biden as VP. Even more important is that the photo is a head shot (their face and not much else). I use pixlr.com to crop photos.
-
They'll probably be like the event cards but with only Name and Text boxes. The meter cards will be kind of complicated. I'm picturing them being 4 sides cards, meaning they are cards that are turned, depending on what direction the country is going on that particular issue. Maybe they should be called Dial Cards. For instance, there will be a Revenue Meter or dial. Actually two (one for positive and one for negative, unless we can make the cards front and back). One side (or one card) would have Revenue +1 on the top, Revenue +2 on the right, Revenue +3 on the bottom, Revenue +4 on the left. The card is turned to present the revenue level. I am trying to only have 8 dial cards (10 at most). I'm still trying to sort these out.
-
I did. I think you did a terrific job on those.
-
I think it would have built a stronger, more unified Whig Party, and somewhat diluted the Democratic Party. I think Adams would have actually adopted a lot of the Democratic platform--expanded suffrage, for instance. I think the country would have drifted in a more European direction in that internal improvement, social improvements, and so on would have been government subsidized. I think we have industrialized much swifter. I think Adams and Obama are similar in that both presidents had tremendous vision but were stymied by a Congress that couldn't see much beyond the present. Obama was also hampered by going into the presidency with minimal experience, so he sort of wasted the two years he had with a friendly Congress. I think Obama in 2012 or 2016, after having been in the Senate for a full term, would have made an even better president.
